STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
RONALD SMITH, APPELLEE
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
RONALD SMITH, APPELLEE
619 So. 2d 307
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1993)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Having accepted jurisdiction pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.160, this court reverses the suppression order that was presented in this appeal for review, and remands the case to the trial court. See State v. Rochelle, 609 So. 2d 613 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).
GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ., concur. ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION
We grant the motion and certify as questions of great public importance those certified in State v. Nevadomski, 619 So. 2d 310 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).
GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and ANSTEAD, J., concur. HERSEY, J., dissents without opinion.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Elia v. State, 635 So. 2d 10 (Fla. 1994)…PER CURIAM. We have for review State v. Elia, 619 So. 2d 307 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993), which certified the same questions we have answered in Carino v. State, 635 So. 2d 9 (Fla.1994). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Based on Carino, the decision below is approved. It is so ordered. BARKETT…
-
Smith v. State, 636 So. 2d 507 (Fla. 1994)…PER CURIAM. The decision of the district court of appeal, State v. Smith, 619 So. 2d 307 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993), which we review based on certified questions, Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const., is approved on the authority of Carino v. State, 635 So. 2d 9 (Fla.1994). It is so ordered. [*508] GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, SHAW, KOGAN…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Sydney Rochelle, 609 So. 2d 613 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)
- State v. Nevadomski, 619 So. 2d 310 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)