MARILYN HERMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
ALAN HERMAN, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the trial court erred in rejecting the master's finding regarding the marital home and abused its discretion in the equitable distribution of retirement benefits.
The wife appealed an order on report of a general master concerning the dissolution of marriage. The trial court rejected the master's finding that th…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Survivor'S Benefits cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Marilyn Herman appeals an order on report of the general master. We reverse.
We find that the trial court erred in rejecting the master’s finding that the final dissolution judgment awarded Marilyn Herman the marital home free and clear of the first mortgage. The master’s finding was supported by substantial competent evidence and was not clearly erroneous. The trial court, therefore, improperly substituted its judgment. Bragassa v. Bragassa, 505 So. 2d 556, 558 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).
Additionally, the trial court abused its discretion in awarding Marilyn Herman only a minimal portion of Mr. Herman’s retirement benefits in light of the factors set forth in section 61.075, Florida Statutes (1991). There is no record evidence justifying such a meager award. The parties had been married for 33 years. During the marriage Mrs. Herman was a homemaker and eared for the parties’ children. Her poor health prevents her from obtaining employment. Compare Lozano-Ciccia v. Lozano, 599 So. 2d 718 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). Moreover, under the facts of this ease, the trial court erred in failing to award Marilyn Herman survivor benefits. See Heldmyer v. Heldmyer, 555 So. 2d 1324 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). On remand, the trial court should equitably distribute Mr. Her man’s retirement benefits and survivor benefits.
In view of the foregoing analysis, on remand the trial court may reconsider Marilyn Herman’s motion for modification of alimony. The order on appeal is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Reversed and remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Herman v. Herman, 661 So. 2d 1260 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)…PER CURIAM. Alan Herman appeals, and Marilyn Herman cross-appeals, the final order of the trial court on remand from this court’s decision in Herman v. Herman, 624 So. 2d 342 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). After careful consideration of the parties’ contentions, we conclude that the trial court order is consistent with the mandate of this court’s prior decision, and that the trial court’s awards are within the bounds of permissible…
Authorities Cited
- Bragassa v. Bragassa, 505 So. 2d 556 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
- Lozano-Ciccia v. Lozano, 599 So. 2d 718 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)
- Hoskins v. State, 555 So. 2d 1324 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990)