JAMES SURFACE, APPELLANT,
v.
TOWN OF BAY HARBOR ISLANDS, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a Pure Bill of Discovery can be amended to include a statutory cause of action, and leave to amend should be freely given.
Plaintiff, a police lieutenant, filed a Pure Bill of Discovery to ascertain reasons for his demotion. The trial court denied his motion to amend the c…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Pure Bill Of Discovery cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
James Surface appeals from an order denying his motion for leave to file an amended complaint and from a final order of dismissal. For the following reasons, we reverse and remand.
Surface, formerly a police lieutenant with the Town of Bay Harbor Islands, filed a complaint denominated as a Pure Bill of Discovery seeking to determine the reasons for his demotion in the police department. Thereafter, the trial court denied his motion to amend the complaint to include a new count under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging a violation of his civil rights. The trial court then entered a final order of dismissal.
The trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion to amend. The Town asserts that a Pure Bill of Discovery cannot be amended to state a cause of action at law and that Surface should be required to file a separate action. However, the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure mandate, “[tjhere shall be one form of action to be known as ‘civil action.’ ” Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.040. The mere fact that a complaint is called a Pure Bill of Discovery does not mean that it cannot be amended to allege a statutory cause of action. See McSwiggcm v. Edson, 186 So. 2d 13 (Fla.1966) (where an amended pleading asserts claims arising out of the same act on which the original pleading is founded, the amended pleading will not be regarded as a new cause of action). Furthermore, “[ljeave of court [to amend] shall be given freely when justice so requires.” Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.190(a).
Accordingly, we reverse the orders on appeal and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Knight v. State, 721 So. 2d 287 (Fla. 1998)…Allen in finding that the “court’s obligation to maintain safety and security in the courtroom outweighs, under proper circumstances, the risk that the security measures may impair the defendant’s presumption of innocence”); accord Joseph v. State, 625 So. 2d 109 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). We [*296] find no error in the judge’s instruction to the jury. From the record it is apparent that Knight had every opportunity to remain in the courtroom, but chose to misbehave. Indeed, his consistently obstinate behavior, wh…
-
Knight v. State, 923 So. 2d 387 (Fla. 2005)…Allen in finding that the “court’s obligation to maintain safety and security in the courtroom outweighs, under proper circumstances, the risk that the security measures may impair the defendant’s presumption of innocence”); accord Joseph v. State, 625 So. 2d 109 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). Knight, 746 So. 2d at 432. The trial court heard the testimony of numerous witnesses regarding the in courtroom behavioral difficulties of the defendant. Based on their testimony, the court found the behavior willful. RST 204-2…
-
Allen v. State, 643 So. 2d 87 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)…ion from a second degree felony to a first degree felony, separate conviction and sentence for exhibition of a weapon violated appellant’s constitutional right against double jeopardy. Cleveland v. State, 587 So. 2d 1145 (Fla.1991); Joseph v. State, 625 So. 2d 109 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). Therefore, we affirm the conviction and sentence for manslaughter with a firearm, but reverse the conviction and sentence for exhibition of a deadly weapon. Affirmed in part, reversed in part.…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- McSWIGGAN v. Murray Edson, 186 So. 2d 13 (Fla. 1966)