JOEY WASHINGTON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Habitual Felony Offender Sentencing cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This court’s original decision in this case affirmed appellant’s conviction but reversed his sentence as a habitual felony offender for failure to make sufficient findings pursuant to section 775.084(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1989). Washington v. State, 610 So. 2d 517 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). On review of a certified question concerning the findings required in sentencing one as a habitual offender, the supreme court quashed our decision on this issue and remanded the case for further proceedings in accordance with State v. Rucker, 613 So. 2d 460 (Fla.1993). Consistent with that decision, appellant’s sentence as a habitual offender, as well as his conviction, is hereby AFFIRMED.
No motion for rehearing will be entertained. The Clerk will issue mandate forthwith.
ZEHMER, C.J., and ERVIN and ALLEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Washington v. State, 637 So. 2d 296 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)…ourt thereafter quashed Washington I in State v. Washington, 620 So. 2d 1231 (Fla.1993) (Washington II), and remanded to this court for further proceedings. We thereafter affirmed the original habitual felony offender sentences. Washington v. State, 625 So. 2d 1233 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993) (Washington III). The trial court resentenced Washington pursuant to Washington I on December 21, 1992, prior to either a ruling on the motion for clarification or issuance of the mandate. The trial court imposed identical concu…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Rucker, 613 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 1993)
- Washington v. State, 610 So. 2d 517 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)