MARCOS D. HERNANDEZ, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF STATE, DIVISION OF LICENSING, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Hernandez challenges the constitutionality of a 1991 statute that retroactively revoked his private investigator's license based on a prior felony conviction. The court upheld the statute, holding that a private investigator's license is not a property right and that the legislative determination to deny such licenses to convicted felons serves a great public interest.
The retroactive application of section 493.6118(4) is constitutional because a private investigator's license is not a property right, and the legislature's determination that denying such licenses to convicted felons serves a great public interest is not arbitrary.
[1] A license issued by a state agency is a privilege, not a property right, and therefore creates no vested rights.
[2] A statute requiring revocation of a license based on a felony conviction is constitutional even if the conviction occurred before the statute's enactment, provided a grea…
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“a private investigator's license is not a property right, and the legislative determination, that a great public interest is served by denying the license to a convicted felon, is not arbitrary”
States the court's holding on the constitutional validity of retroactive license revocation
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceHernandez was convicted of a felony (killing another with a firearm) in 1981 and imprisoned. After his release, he applied for and received a private …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Restoration Of Civil Rights cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Hernandez challenges the constitutionality of a statute which commands a state agency to revoke a license for conduct which was not disqualifying when the license was issued.
In 1981 Hernandez was convicted of a felony — the killing of another with a firearm — and sentenced to a term of imprisonment. Shortly after his release from prison, Hernandez applied for and was granted a private investigator’s license. In 1991 the legislature tightened the qualifications for a private investigator’s license by amending chapter 493. The controlling provision is section 493.6118(4), Florida Statutes, which provides:
[I]f the applicant or licensee has been convicted of a felony in any state ..., the department shall deny the application or revoke the license unless and until civil rights have been restored by the State of Florida ... and a period of 10 years has expired since final release from supervision.
When the appellant’s license was revoked in 1992 his civil rights had not been restored. Hernandez’s constitutional claim is bottomed on an assertion that the issuance of a license creates a vested right, or that the license itself is a property right. We rejected the same contention in Crane v. Department of State, Div. of Licensing, 547 So. 2d 266 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), which is controlling. In Crane we noted, relying on Mayo v. Market Fruit Co. of Sanford, 40 So. 2d 555 (Fla.1949), that a firearms license was a privilege which created no vested rights. We held that section 790.06(2)(k), which similarly requires the division to retroactively revoke a firearm license issued to a convicted felon, was valid.
The test for the validity of a statute which retroactively abrogates a thing of value is whether a great public interest is served by the statute, the extent to which any right is abrogated, and the nature of the right affected. State Dep’t of Transp. v. Knowles, 402 So. 2d 1155, 1158 (Fla.1981).
We hold that retroactive application of section 493.6118(4) is not unconstitutional because a private investigator’s license is not a property right, and the legislative determination, that a great public interest is served by denying the license to a convicted felon, is not arbitrary.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State v. Knowles, 402 So. 2d 1155 (Fla. 1981)
- Mayo v. Mkt. Fruit Co. of Sanford, 40 So.2d 555 (Fla. 1949)
- Crane v. Dep't of State, 547 So. 2d 266 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)