THADDEUS BROWN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Thaddeus Brown appealed his probation revocation sentence, challenging the trial court's denial of credit for gain time earned during his initial imprisonment. The Florida District Court of Appeal held that Brown was entitled to credit for both time actually served and gain time earned on the incarcerative portion of his split sentence, as his offense predated a statutory amendment that would have authorized forfeiture of such credits.
The court held that because Brown's offense predated the statutory amendment, the case is governed by State v. Green, which requires that credit be given for both time actually served in prison and gain time earned. The trial court erred in forfeiting the gain time credits.
[1] A defendant is entitled to credit for all gain time earned on the incarcerative portion of a split sentence when probation is revoked, if the offense was committed before…
[2] A trial court errs in limiting a defendant's credit for time served to only the actual time spent in prison, excluding earned gain time, when revoking a split sentence fo…
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“he ... gets credit for the five years less any forfeited gain time or early release, whatever. I think he's entitled to exactly what he served: no more, no less. And that's as plain as I can put it, folks.”
The trial judge's statement explaining the denial of gain-time credit, which the appellate court found erroneous.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceBrown was convicted of trafficking in cocaine and sentenced to five years in prison followed by five years on probation. He served the prison sentence…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Gain Time Credit cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Thaddeus Brown (Brown) was charged by information with trafficking in more than 200 grams of cocaine on March 8, 1989. He pled nolo contendere to the charge, and was convicted of one count of trafficking, in violation of section 893.135, Florida Statutes (1989), a first-degree felony. Brown was sentenced to five years in prison, to be followed by a term of five years on probation. He served the prison term in fourteen months, due to a combination of mandatory and incentive gain time, and was released on probation.
Brown subsequently violated the terms of his probation and was revoked. At sentene- ing, the State advised the court that Brown had credit for five years in prison, to which the judge responded: “he ... gets credit for the five years less any forfeited gain time or early release, whatever. I think he’s entitled to exactly what he served: no more, no less. And that’s as plain as I can put it, folks.” The trial judge then sentenced Brown to eight years in prison, with credit only for the actual time he spent in prison before resentencing, and thirty-six days in jail while awaiting the hearing and resentencing. Brown appeals this sentence.
The State correctly concedes that the trial court erred in limiting Brown’s credit to time actually served and forfeiting the gain time he earned on the incarcerative portion of his split sentence. Moultrie v. State, 618 So. 2d 789 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993) (citing State v. Green, 547 So. 2d 925 (Fla.1989)). Prior to the enactment of section 948.06(6), Florida Statutes (1989), when a split sentence was imposed and the probationary portion of that split sentence was revoked, credit was given for both time actually served in prison and gain time earned under section 944.275, Florida Statutes (1987).1 State v. Green, 547 So. 2d 925. Section 948.06(6) however effectively overruled State v. Green.
Because Brown committed the original underlying offense before the effective date of this statutory amendment, this case is governed by Green. Moultrie v. State; Jackson v. State, 619 So. 2d 431 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).
We thus remand with instructions that the trial court give Brown credit for the entire five-year prison portion of his split sentence, as well as credit for the time he served while awaiting the violation of probation hearing and sentencing. This may be accomplished by order of the trial court without requiring the presence of appellant.
BOOTH, LAWRENCE and DAVIS, JJ., concur. . "Credit for time served” did not include "provisional credits” or "administrative gain time” credits under section 944.277, Florida Statutes (1988); these credits are used to alleviate prison overcrowding. Tripp v. State, 622 So. 2d 941, 942-43 n. 2 (Fla.1993).
. Section 948.06(6), Florida Statutes (1989), provides in relevant part:
Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, whenever probation or community control, including the probationary or community control portion of a split sentence, is violated and the probation or community control is revoked, the offender, by reason of his misconduct, may be deemed to have forfeited all gain-time or commutation of time for good conduct, as provided by law, earned up to the date of his release on probation or community control from a state correctional institution. This subsection does not deprive the prisoner of his right to gain-time or commutation of time for good conduct, as provided by law, from the date on which he is returned to prison.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Thomas v. State, 648 So. 2d 298 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)…ther contends that the credit for time served does not include provisional credits or administrative gain time used to alleviate prison overcrowding. See § 944.277(7)(c), Fla.Stat. (1991); Tripp, 622 So. 2d at 942-943, n. 2. See also Brown v. State, 632 So. 2d 699, 700, n. 1. (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Webb v. State, 630 So. 2d 674, 676 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). Emphasizing that the trial court intended only to credit appellant with any time served to which he was legally entitled, appellee contends that the trial cour…
-
Gant v. State, 642 So. 2d 84 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994)…wever, a defendant is entitled to credit for time served and gain time accrued during any earlier imprisonment underlying the probation violation. State v. Green, 547 So. 2d 925 (Fla.1989); State v. Carter, 553 So. 2d 169 (Fla.1989); Brown v. State, 632 So. 2d 699 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Ferguson v. State, 594 So. 2d 864 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992). Though State v. Green has since been overruled by section 948.06(6), Florida Statutes (1989), Green continues to govern where the offenses underlying the probation violation…1 / 2
-
Curry v. State, 659 So. 2d 462 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)…§ 948.06(6), Fla.Stat. (1993); Ch. 89-531, §§ 13,19, Laws of Fla. As Curry committed his offenses prior to October 1, 1989, he is entitled to receive credit for all accrued gain time. See Bradley v. State, 631 So. 2d 1096 (Fla.1994); Brown v. State, 632 So. 2d 699 [*463] (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). See also State v. Green, 547 So. 2d 925 (Fla.1989). REVERSED and REMANDED. PETERSON, C.J. and COBB, J., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Tripp v. State, 622 So. 2d 941 (Fla. 1993)
- State v. Green, 547 So. 2d 925 (Fla. 1989)
- Rosetta Slater Jackson and Frank Steven Davis v. State, 619 So. 2d 431 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)
- Moultrie v. State, 618 So. 2d 789 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)