ERNEST M. STEELE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ERNEST M. STEELE, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
634 So. 2d 827
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1994)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief. On the issue of counsel’s alleged “promise” as to appellant’s eligibility for gain time, the record reflects appellant’s acknowledgment at his plea hearing that no “promises,” other than those referred to at the plea hearing, had been made to him by anyone. This is sufficient to support a denial of his claim. See Zaetler v. State, 627 So. 2d 1328 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).
ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Arroyo v. State, 651 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)…sentence comport with the oral pronouncement in open court. McBride v. State, 617 So. 2d 405 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). We therefore reverse as to this point on appeal and remand for the sole purpose of correcting the written sentence. See Royal v. State, 634 So. 2d 827 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). In all other respects we affirm the convictions and sentences. AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED. HERSEY, GLICKSTEIN and POLEN, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Zaetler v. State, 627 So. 2d 1328 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)