PABLO ARROYO, A/K/A ANTONIO RICEDA, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PABLO ARROYO, A/K/A ANTONIO RICEDA, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
651 So. 2d 223
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1995)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
At sentencing in lower court case number 88-9924, the trial court announced a sentence of ten years. The written sentence is thirty years. It is required that the written sentence comport with the oral pronouncement in open court. McBride v. State, 617 So. 2d 405 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). We therefore reverse as to this point on appeal and remand for the sole purpose of correcting the written sentence. See Royal v. State, 634 So. 2d 827 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). In all other respects we affirm the convictions and sentences.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.
HERSEY, GLICKSTEIN and POLEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Vandy Tarrant v. State, 668 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)…20, Florida Statutes (1991), in effect at the time the incident was alleged to [*227] have taken place, the amount payable to the Crimes Compensation Trust Fund was $20.00. See Bartlett v. State, 638 So. 2d 631 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Chapman v. State, 651 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); and Ch. 92-287, Laws of Fla. The state further concedes that the imposition of the $200.00 costs of prosecution was erroneous on grounds that before such costs could be imposed, it was obligated to demonstrate the amount spent o…
-
Arroyo v. State, 704 So. 2d 655 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)…e totalling 140 years did not comport with the oral sentence for 120 years. Appellant prevailed on this point. In its opinion this court affirmed the convictions and sentences in all respects save for the incorrect written sentence. Arroyo v. State, 651 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). As to the sufficiency of the trial court’s explanation of an habitual offender sentence’s consequences, Arroyo argues the court failed to fully explain the effect of such a sentence on appellant’s entitlement, if any, to gain t…
-
Saulsberry v. State, 929 So. 2d 664 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)…nouncement of five years probation on each count, concurrent, with a condition of sixty days jail to be served as long weekends, controls over the written sentence order imposing sixty days as a condition of ten years probation. See Arroyo v. State, 651 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Trueblood v. State, 635 So. 2d 1024 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Kelly v. State, 414 So. 2d 1117 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). Additionally, the sentence order improperly included a general sentence for both counts. See Burgess v. State, 691 So.…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- McBRIDE v. State, 617 So. 2d 405 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)
- Steele v. State, 634 So. 2d 827 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)
- Royal v. State, 634 So. 2d 827 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)