JAMES TAYLOR, APPELLANT,
v.
GENERAL MASONRY, INC. AND WAUSAU INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEES

Fla. 1st DCA | 1994-06-01
No. 92-2561
JOANOS and KAHN, JJ., concur.
637 So. 2d 361 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1994) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case


Opinion of the Court
ERVIN, Judge.

ERVIN, Judge.

We reverse and remand the case with directions to award claimant indemnity benefits based on an average weekly wage (AWW) of $480, and its corresponding compensation rate (CR). This issue was mature and ripe for adjudication at the time the earlier September 5, 1990 compensation order was entered; therefore, the issue could not be relitigated at the subsequent hearing, which resulted in the order of June 16, 1992, awarding benefits based on a lesser AWW and CR than that on which such benefits had earlier been awarded. See City of Hialeah v. Cascardo, 443 So. 2d 448 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Florida Power & Light Co. v. Haycraft, 421 So. 2d 674 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Hunt v. International Mineral & Chem. Corp., 410 So. 2d 640 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

REVERSED and REMANDED for proceedings consistent with this decision.

JOANOS and KAHN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Jenkins v. State, 96 So. 3d 1110 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)
    …obber. The trial court denied the motion, finding the out-of-court identification not “unduly suggestive.” We review the denial of Appellant’s motion to suppress the victim’s out-of-court identification for abuse of discretion. See Jordan v. State, 637 So. 2d 361 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). “The test for suppression of an out-of-court identification is twofold: (1) whether the police used an unnecessarily suggestive procedure to obtain the out-of-court identification; and (2) if so, considering all the circumstance…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw