LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF GEORGIA, APPELLANT,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, STATE OF FLORIDA, DIVISION OF UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 1994-08-05
No. 93-2787
W. SHARP, GOSHORN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
640 So. 2d 1221 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1994) Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Life Insurance Company of Georgia (“Life of Georgia”) appeals the final order entered in favor of the Department of Labor and Unemployment Security, Division of Unemployment Compensation (“the Division”) affirming the Division’s determination that certain insurance agents at Life of Georgia were not remunerated solely by commission and thus, were employees subject to the provisions of the Florida Unemployment Compensation Law.

We affirm. See Commonwealth Life Ins. v. Walters, 581 So. 2d 643 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 591 So. 2d 180 (Fla.1991); Realty Management Corp. v. Kemp, 380 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).

AFFIRMED.

W. SHARP, GOSHORN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Richardson v. State, 646 So. 2d 303 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994)
    …did not realize that it was imposing a departure sentence, on remand the court may impose a departure sentence as long as proper contemporaneous written reasons are provided. See State v. Betancourt, 552 So. 2d 1107, 1108 (Fla.1989); Hicks v. State, 640 So. 2d 1221, 1222 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).1 Convictions AFFIRMED; sentence VACATED; cause REMANDED. COBB and GOSHORN, JJ., concur. . We note that the trial court also ordered Richardson to pay $60 to First Step of Volusia County without citing any statutory…
  • Garaguso v. State, 648 So. 2d 327 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)
    …not exceed the maximum allowable period of time permitted by the guidelines. State v. Davis, 630 So. 2d 1059 (Fla.1994); Felty v. State, 630 So. 2d 1092 (Fla.1994). Accordingly, we quash the sentence and remand for resentencing. See Hicks v. State, 640 So. 2d 1221 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Brown v. State, 639 So. 2d 1136 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). AFFIRMED in part; SENTENCE QUASHED; REMANDED for resentencing. GOSHORN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.…
  • Gordon v. State, 649 So. 2d 326 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)
    …did not realize that it was imposing a departure sentence, on remand the trial court may impose a departure sentence if valid contemporaneous written reasons are provided. See State v. Betancourt, 552 So. 2d 1107, 1108-09 (Fla.1989); Hicks v. State, 640 So. 2d 1221, 1222 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). Alternatively, the trial court may bump up Gordon’s sentence one cell for each of the violations of probation, for a total of two cells; however, as the state properly concedes, Gordon’s sentence may not exceed three years…

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw