EDWARD RICHARDSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 1994-12-22
No. 94-1458
COBB and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.
646 So. 2d 303 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1994) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case


Opinion of the Court
DIAMANTIS, Judge.

DIAMANTIS, Judge.

We vacate Edward Richardson’s sentence for possession of cocaine and remand for resentencing on the authority of State v. Davis, 630 So. 2d 1059 (Fla.1994); however, because the trial court did not realize that it was imposing a departure sentence, on remand the court may impose a departure sentence as long as proper contemporaneous written reasons are provided. See State v. Betancourt, 552 So. 2d 1107, 1108 (Fla.1989); Hicks v. State, 640 So. 2d 1221, 1222 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).1

Convictions AFFIRMED; sentence VACATED; cause REMANDED.

COBB and GOSHORN, JJ., concur. . We note that the trial court also ordered Richardson to pay $60 to First Step of Volusia County without citing any statutory authority for the imposition of this cost item. On remand, this matter should be corrected. See Tibero v. State, 646 So. 2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (en banc). See also Craig v. State, 643 So. 2d 50 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Pulles v. State, 650 So. 2d 1141 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)
    …nd the court may impose a departure sentence as long as proper contemporaneous written reasons are provided.” See State v. Betancourt, 552 So. 2d 1107, 1108 (Fla.1989); Hicks v. State, 640 So. 2d 1221, 1222 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).” Richardson v. State, 646 So. 2d 303, 303 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (footnote omitted). The order under review is reversed and the cause remanded for resentencing.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw