BRANDON THOMPSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, a juvenile, was convicted of battery and sentenced as an adult. Appellant contends that the trial court did not meet the requirements of section 39.059(7), Fla.Stat. (1993), in imposing adult sanctions because the trial court did not address all of the statutory criteria and the trial court did not enter a written order containing findings of fact and the reasons for imposing adult sanctions. We must reverse and remand for resentencing in accordance with section 39.059(7) and Troutman v. State, 630 So. 2d 528 (Fla.1993) (trial court must consider each of criteria of section 39.059(7)(c), and must provide written findings and reasons at the time of sentencing).
REVERSED and REMANDED with directions.
JOANOS, LAWRENCE and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
White v. State, 651 So. 2d 1264 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)…sentencing order was not entered until 11 days after sentence was orally pronounced. We must, therefore, reverse and remand for resentencing in accordance with the dictates of Troutman v. State, 630 So. 2d 528 (Fla.1993). See also Thompson v. State, 640 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). The convictions for attempted manslaughter and unlawful discharge of a firearm on school property are affirmed. ERVIN, MINER and WOLF, JJ., concur. . The state charged appellant with violating section 790.115(2)(a), Florida…
Authorities Cited
- Troutman v. State, 630 So. 2d 528 (Fla. 1993)
- Edler v. State, 630 So. 2d 528 (Fla. 1993)