DON OLSON FIRESTONE AND GALLAGHER BASSETT INSURANCE, APPELLANTS,
v.
JIMMY HINDS, JR., APPELLEE
DON OLSON FIRESTONE AND GALLAGHER BASSETT INSURANCE, APPELLANTS,
JIMMY HINDS, JR., APPELLEE
641 So. 2d 514
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1994)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
MICKLE, Judge.
We conclude that the record contains competent substantial evidence to support the order of the judge of compensation claims.
AFFIRMED.
BARFIELD, J., concurs.
MINER, J., dissents with written opinion.
Dissent
MINER, Judge,
dissenting.
Because I believe the claimant failed to establish by expert testimony a causal con- neetion between his work related accident and his complaints of hip pain, I respectfully dissent. At best, Dr. Bercaw’s overall testimony is vague, ambiguous and inconclusive, so much so that I believe it to be wholly insufficient to support a finding of causal relationship.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Barbaree v. State, 700 So. 2d 469 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)…appellant’s earlier Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion was denied was not a determination “on the merits,” the trial court erred in denying the subsequent rule 3.850 motion as “successive.” See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850(f); Purcell v. State, 641 So. 2d 514 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Freeman v. State, 589 So. 2d 368 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Williams v. State, 561 So. 2d 1349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). We accordingly reverse the order under review and remand this ease to the trial court for consideration of the appella…
-
Scott v. State, 658 So. 2d 558 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)…iction against successive motions on the same grounds is applied only when the grounds raised were previously adjudicated on their merits, and not where the previous motion was summarily denied or dismissed for legal insufficiency. Purcell v. State, 641 So. 2d 514 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Freeman v. State, 589 So. 2d 368 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Ames v. State, 518 So. 2d 465 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). Herein, the trial court did not attach anything to its order denying relief to demonstrate that an earlier motion was denie…
-
Taylor v. State, 700 So. 2d 470 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)…nsufficient, we affirm the order by which the trial court denied the appellant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion. We do so without prejudice to the appellant’s right to file a timely, facially sufficient motion. See Purcell v. State, 641 So. 2d 514 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Freeman v. State, 589 So. 2d 368 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Williams v. State, 561 So. 2d 1349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). MINER, ALLEN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.…