WILLIAM DONALD TAYLOR, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
WILLIAM DONALD TAYLOR, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
700 So. 2d 470
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1997)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Because the appellant’s claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel were facially insufficient, we affirm the order by which the trial court denied the appellant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion. We do so without prejudice to the appellant’s right to file a timely, facially sufficient motion. See Purcell v. State, 641 So. 2d 514 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Freeman v. State, 589 So. 2d 368 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Williams v. State, 561 So. 2d 1349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).
MINER, ALLEN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Freeman v. State, 589 So. 2d 368 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)
- Williams v. State, 561 So. 2d 1349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)
- Purcell v. State, 641 So. 2d 514 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)
- Firestone v. Hinds, 641 So. 2d 514 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)