STEVE RAY BUNCH, PETITIONER,
v.
HON. CARL MARKEL, CIRCUIT COURT CLERK, ETC., RESPONDENTS
STEVE RAY BUNCH, PETITIONER,
HON. CARL MARKEL, CIRCUIT COURT CLERK, ETC., RESPONDENTS
642 So. 2d 677
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1994)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 18 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We grant the petition filed by Steve Ray Bunch seeking a Writ of Mandamus, and issue the writ directing respondent, Carl “Bud” Markel, to file Bunch’s notice of appeal and affidavit of insolvency nunc pro tunc to the date that these matters were originally submitted. See Martin v. Circuit Court, Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 627 So. 2d 1298, 1300 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). See also Williams v. State, 324 So. 2d 74 (Fla. 1975).
WRIT GRANTED.
DAUKSCH, PETERSON and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Houser v. State, 666 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)…s hen in the amount of $250 where Houser was not given prior notice of the lien or informed at sentencing that he had 30 days to object to the amount. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.720(d)(1). See also Bull v. State, 548 So. 2d 1103 (Fla.1989); Burke v. State, 642 So. 2d 677 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). We strike the public defender’s hen, without prejudice on remand to reimpose it after proper notice is furnished. In all other respects, the judgment and sentences are affirmed. AFFIRMED in part; HABITUAL OFFENDER ADJUDICATION…
-
Bristol v. State, 667 So. 2d 486 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996)…s” to his employer. Condition 6 also requires the appellant to “work faithfully at suitable employment.” This condition must be modified to require the appellant to “work faithfully at suitable employment insofar as may be possible.” Burke v. State, 642 So. 2d 677, 678 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (emphasis added). Accordingly, we affirm the appellant’s judgment and sentence and remand to the trial court to modify the written order of probation in accordance with this opinion. CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and QUINCE, J., con…
-
McLEOD v. State, 645 So. 2d 116 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994)…, 634 So. 2d 197 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). Additionally, the court improperly assessed attorney fees against appellant without first giving him notice of the intention to assess fees and a hearing regarding the entitlement and amount. See Burke v. State, 642 So. 2d 677 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Craig v. State, 643 So. 2d 50 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Dewitt v. State, 639 So. 2d 694 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Edwards v. State, 639 So. 2d 107 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Griffin v. State, 636 So. 2d 589 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Fulmore v. State…
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Williams v. State, 324 So. 2d 74 (Fla. 1975)
- Martin v. Cir. Court, 627 So. 2d 1298 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)