PAUL C. DICATALDO, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION AND RESORT INNS OF AMERICA, INC., APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Paul DiCataldo was discharged by his employer for taking a company tile cutter home without authorization, violating company policy. The appeals referee found no misconduct because DiCataldo's actions were reasonable under the circumstances and he lacked intent to deprive the employer of the property. The court reversed the Unemployment Appeals Commission's reversal, reinstating the referee's decision awarding unemployment benefits.
The court reversed the UAC's order and reinstated the appeals referee's decision awarding benefits. The UAC lacked authority to modify the referee's findings of fact based on credibility determinations, as substantial competent evidence supported the referee's findings that DiCataldo's actions were reasonable and not undertaken with intent to deprive the employer of property.
[1] An unemployment appeals commission may only modify or reverse the findings and conclusions of an appeals referee where the referee's findings and conclusions are not base…
[2] Credibility determinations are within the province of the trier of fact, such as an appeals referee.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“The UAC may only modify or reverse the findings and conclusions of an appeals referee where the referee's findings and conclusions are not based on substantial, competent evidence.”
Establishes the legal standard of review for the Unemployment Appeals Commission's authority over appeals referee decisions
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceDiCataldo was a rooms engineering manager for Resort Inns of America. An employee borrowed the tile cutter from his department without permission and …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Employee Misconduct cases and more on FLexlaw
QUINCE, Judge.
The claimant, Paul C. DiCataldo, appeals an order of the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission (UAC) reversing the appeals referee’s decision that he was entitled to benefits because he was not fired due to misconduct. We reverse.
The claimant was a rooms engineering manager for Resort Inns of America, Inc. He was in charge of a tile cutter assigned to his department. An employee borrowed the tile cutter without permission and kept it for several months. When the cutter was returned, it was in need of repair. The claimant took the cutter home to repair it. He decided to keep the tile cutter at his home, which was about five minutes from his place of employment, until he could find a secure place to store it to prevent unauthorized use. The tile cutter was stolen from an unlocked area of the claimant’s garage before he could return it to the hotel. When claimant’s employer was informed of the theft, the claimant was discharged for violating a company policy that prohibited the taking of employer’s property by employees without prior authorization by management.
The appeals referee believed the claimant’s testimony that his actions were not intended to deprive the employer of the property. The referee found that although the claimant exercised poor judgment in leaving the tile cutter in an unlocked area, his actions were reasonable in light of the recent occurrences at work. The referee also found the claimant believed he had the discretion as a manager to take the cutter home for repair and storage. Therefore, the referee concluded the claimant was entitled to benefits since he was not discharged due to misconduct.
The UAC reversed the appeals referee’s decision, holding the referee made an incorrect conclusion of law in finding no misconduct. In addition, the UAC made modifications to the findings of fact which were in conflict with facts found by the referee. The UAC indicated the conduct of the claimant was egregious since he was a manager. However, the referee found the conduct reasonable. These findings were based on credibility determinations. Such determinations are within the province of the trier of fact, in this instance, the referee.
The UAC may only modify or reverse the findings and conclusions of an appeals referee where the referee’s findings and conclusions are not based on substantial, competent evidence. Jones v. Creative World School, Inc., 603 So. 2d 118 (Fla.2d DCA 1992); Verner v. UAC, 474 So. 2d 909 (Fla.2d DCA 1985). There was substantial, competent evidence to support the findings of fact and the conclusion that the claimant was discharged for reasons other than misconduct. Therefore, it was error for the UAC to reverse the decision of the appeals referee.
Accordingly, we reverse the order of the UAC and reinstate the decision of the appeals referee.
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Verner v. State, 474 So. 2d 909 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)
- Port Everglades Auth. v. Honorable Robert Lance Andrews, 603 So. 2d 118 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)
- Jones v. Creative World Sch., Inc., 603 So. 2d 118 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)