BRIAN EUGENE HAY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Violation Of Probation cases and more on FLexlaw
FULMER, Judge.
We reverse the trial court’s order which revoked the defendant’s probation for failure to follow job search instructions given to him by his probation officer. The probation officer ordered the defendant to apply to twenty-six possible places of employment on November 17, 1992, beginning at 7:00 a.m. and to report to the officer the next day with a list of the employers he had contacted. When the defendant failed to complete the job search as instructed, an affidavit was filed alleging that the defendant violated condition (8) of the probation order, which required compliance with all instructions given by the probation officer. The trial court erred in finding that the defendant violated his probation. The probation officer’s directive to complete the strict job search was' not such a matter of routine supervision as to be encompassed by the requirement of condition (8) that the defendant comply with all instructions given by the probation officer. See Holterhous v. State, 417 So. 2d 291 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982).
Reversed.
RYDER, A.C.J. and PATTERSON, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Safeco Ins. Co. OF Ill. v. Fridman, 117 So. 3d 16 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013)…Co., 643 So. 2d 617 (Fla.1994). Since Blanchard, this Court has decided a number of cases consistently therewith. See Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Cook, 696 So. 2d 497 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (homeowner’s insurance claim); Utah Home Fire Ins. Co. v. Navarro, 642 So. 2d 1200 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994) (homeowner’s insurance claim); Sivilla v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 614 So. 2d 553 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993) (automobile collision insurance claim); State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Oteiza, 595 So. 2d 1094 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). Id.…
-
Doan v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co., 727 So. 2d 400 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)…Co., 643 So. 2d 617 (Fla.1994). Since Blanchard, this Court has decided a number of cases consistently therewith. See Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Cook, 696 So. 2d 497 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)(homeowner’s insurance claim); Utah Home Fire Ins. Co. v. Navarro, 642 So. 2d 1200 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)(homeowner’s insurance claim); Sivilla v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 614 So. 2d 553 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)(automobile collision insurance claim); State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Oteiza, 595 So. 2d 1094 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). In Ru…
-
Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Regis Cook and Rosina Pereira Cook, 696 So. 2d 497 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)…below, which refused to stay a bad faith claim against the carrier pending the resolution of an underlying coverage dispute, is quashed. See Blanchard v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 575 So. 2d 1289 (Fla.1991); Utah Home Fire Ins. Co. v. Navarro, 642 So. 2d 1200 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Michigan Millers Mut. Ins. Co. v. Bourke, 581 So. 2d 1368 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). Certiorari granted.…
Authorities Cited
- Holterhaus v. State, 417 So. 2d 291 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982)