ULYSSES GREGG, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ULYSSES GREGG, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
643 So. 2d 106
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1994)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 13 cases
Opinion of the Court
ERVIN, Judge.
We dismiss Issue I, because this court has no jurisdiction to review an oral order. State v. Smith, 557 So. 2d 904 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). As to Issue II, we affirm the order revoking community control, but remand the cause with directions to the trial court to enter a written order stating appellant’s violations, in conformance with the court’s oral pronouncement at sentencing. Cue v. State, 619 So. 2d 471 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).
BARFIELD and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Davis v. Heye, 743 So. 2d 1200 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)…ri can be taken and vest jurisdiction in this court. The circuit court only pronounced an oral ruling. See State v. Siegel, 662 So. 2d 1013 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); see also In re Guardianship of A.P., 644 So. 2d 169 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Gregg v. State, 643 So. 2d 106 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). DAUKSCH, COBB and W. SHARP, JJ., concur.…
-
Stepps v. State, 675 So. 2d 1008 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)…e appellant willfully and substantially violated the conditions of community control, the revocation is affirmed. However, on remand the court should amend the revocation order to reflect the specific violations as orally pronounced. Gregg v. State, 643 So. 2d 106 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). A Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.990 guidelines scoresheet was improperly used in this case, as this scoresheet does not apply to offenses committed before 1994. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(a); § 921.001(4)(b)2, Fla. Stat.…
-
Davis v. State, 667 So. 2d 885 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)…n order of revocation failed to state the ground upon which revocation was based. We affirm the order, but remand with directions to the court to include in the written order the violation orally pronounced at the revocation hearing. Gregg v. State, 643 So. 2d 106 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). The trial court properly credited Davis with the 180 days he served in county jail against the incarcerative portion of his new sentence, but it erroneously did not credit him for the period of community control served after r…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- State v. Smith, 557 So. 2d 904 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)
- Sherrond Deangelo CUE v. State, 619 So. 2d 471 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)