HENRY MASON A/K/A HENRY MACON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a scoresheet error requires resentencing, but the trial judge retains the option to sentence the defendant as a habitual violent felony offender.
The defendant's sentences for robbery and firearm possession were based on a scoresheet error, leading to a longer sentence than recommended by the gu…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Habitual Violent Felony Offender cases and more on FLexlaw
PATTERSON, Judge.
Henry Mason challenges his sentences for three counts of robbery and one count of felon in possession of a firearm. We reverse and remand for resentencing.
Mason and the state agree that there was a scoresheet error which resulted in his seventeen-year total sentence — a one-cell increase from the guidelines recommendation. Mason contends that he must be resentenced within the correct permitted guidelines range of five and one-half to twelve years in prison. The state correctly argues, however, that the trial judge has the option of resentencing Mason as a habitual violent felony offender, as the judge originally contemplated at the sentencing hearing. See Harris v. State, 624 So. 2d 279, 280 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993) (“When he chose to appeal from his convictions and sentences, however, Harris risked having the trial court’s misperception of the law corrected.”), approved, 645 So. 2d 386 (Fla.1994).
Here, the trial judge sought to sentence Mason as a violent felony offender for a term of years on the felon in possession of a firearm charge, but defense counsel argued that the offense being sentenced must be violent. The trial judge was also under the impression that if she sentenced Mason as a violent offender on the robberies, a life sentence would be required. As the state points out, a violent offender sentence is proper when sentencing on a nonviolent offense, Maeweather v. State, 599 So. 2d 733 (Fla 1st DCA 1992) (felon in possession of a firearm), approved, 616 So. 2d 16 (Fla.1993), and a life sentence is not required when a violent offender sentence is imposed for a first-degree felony. Burdick v. State, 594 So. 2d 267 (Fla. 1992).
Therefore, the scoresheet error requires that we reverse Mason’s sentences; however, upon remand for resentencing, the trial judge has the option of imposing a habitual violent offender sentence.
Reversed and remanded.
RYDER, A.C.J., and FULMER, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Burdick v. State, 594 So. 2d 267 (Fla. 1992)
- Harris v. State, 645 So. 2d 386 (Fla. 1994)
- Harris v. State, 624 So. 2d 279 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)
- Maeweather v. State, 599 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)
- Maeweather v. State, 616 So. 2d 16 (Fla. 1993)