RANDY HILBERT, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 1994-12-30
No. 94-2041
W. SHARP, PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.
647 So. 2d 1075 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1994) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The denial of Hilbert’s 3.850 motion is affirmed without prejudice to Hilbert’s filing a similar motion supported by a properly executed affidavit in which the affiant swears to the veracity of the facts stated in the affidavit.

AFFIRMED.

W. SHARP, PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Nagy v. State, 657 So. 2d 1283 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)
    …PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Hilbert v. State, 647 So. 2d 1075 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). W. SHARP, GOSHORN and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.…
  • V.P. v. State of Fla. & Dep't of Juv. Just., 72 So. 3d 788 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)
    …iting placement in a residential program. Any form of detention care ordered pending placement had to be authorized by the statutory criteria governing the use of predisposition detention. See R.W. v. Soud, 639 So. 2d 25 (Fla.1994); D.F.M. v. State, 647 So. 2d 1075 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (concluding that court erred in placing juvenile on home detention pending placement where no findings authorizing home detention were made). 1994 Amendments In 1994, the legislature amended the postcommitment detention section…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw