STEPHEN M. NAGY, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Simmons v. State, 684 So. 2d 860 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)
  …ing does not toll the time in which to appeal because it is not authorized and therefore does not have a tolling effect. See Gaylord v. State, 678 So. 2d 481 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Mathis v. State, 674 So. 2d 209 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Simmons v. State, 657 So. 2d 1283 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Kosek v. State, 640 So. 2d 1127 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). This is in contrast with motions for rehearing filed in rule 3.850 cases.1 Unlike rule 3.850, rule 3.800 does not require the trial court to advise a movant that he or she ha…
• MacPherson v. State, 843 So. 2d 354 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)
  …it follows, motions for rehearing in rule 3.800 proceedings do not toll the time for filing a notice of appeal. See, e.g., Mathis v. State, 720 So. 2d 1116 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Gaylord v. State, 678 So. 2d 481 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Simmons v. State, 657 So. 2d 1283 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Kosek v. State, 640 So. 2d 1127 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. dismissed, 648 So. 2d 723 (Fla.1994). [*355] Yet, this same mistake continues to be made primarily by convicted defendants acting pro se. In our view, the discrepancy in how m…
• Bishop v. State, 709 So. 2d 660 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)
  …PER CURIAM. DISMISSED. See, e.g., Nixon v. State, 658 So. 2d 1180 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Simmons v. State, 657 So. 2d 1283 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). GRIFFIN, C.J., and PETERSON and ANTOON, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

• Hilbert v. State, 647 So. 2d 1075 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994)
• D.F.M. v. State, 647 So. 2d 1075 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994)