RENARD DANIELS, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. 5th DCA | 1995-02-17
No. 94-2481
W. Sharp, J., Peterson, J., Thompson, J.
650 So. 2d 226 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1995)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Petitioner's habeas corpus petition is granted because the state conceded he was deprived of his right to appellate review by the state's failure to provide appellate counsel timely, and his appeal is reinstated for proper appellate proceedings.


Holding

A defendant deprived of appellate counsel in a timely fashion is entitled to a writ of habeas corpus and reinstatement of his appeal.


Headnotes

[1] Failure to provide appellate counsel in a timely fashion deprives a defendant of his right to appellate review and entitles him to habeas corpus relief and reinstatement…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Daniels was convicted of burglary, trafficking in stolen property, grand theft, possession of cocaine, petty theft, and possession of paraphernalia, a…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
W. SHARP, Judge.

W. SHARP, Judge.

Daniels petitions this court for a writ of habeas corpus, permitting him to take a belated appeal from his convictions of burglary,1 trafficking in stolen property,2 grand theft,3 possession of cocaine,4 petty theft,5 possession of paraphernalia,6 and the twenty-year habitual offender sentence he received as a consequence. The state concedes Daniels was deprived of his right to appellate review by failure to provide him with appellate counsel in a timely fashion to perfect and prosecute his appeal. Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799 (1963). The petitioner is entitled to relief. See, e.g., Tal-Mason v. Singletary, 596 So. 2d 796 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). Accordingly we grant the petition. We reinstate his appeal. This cause is remanded to the trial court for the appointment of appellate counsel and for preparation of the record on appeal. The record and briefing shall be prepared in accordance with the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure and the timing requirements shall commence upon appointment of appellate counsel.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus GRANTED; Appeal No. 93-2724 REINSTATED.

PETERSON and THOMPSON, JJ., concur. . § 810.02, Fla.Stat. . § 812.019, Fla.Stat. . § 812.014(2), Fla.Stat. . § 893.13, Fla.Stat. . § 812.014(2)(d), Fla.Stat. . § 893.147(1), Fla.Stat.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw