PATRICK MCKENZIE, ETC., APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PATRICK MCKENZIE, ETC., APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
650 So. 2d 1060
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1995)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Poole v. State, 20 Fla.L.Weekly D43,—So. 2d—[1994 WL 706622] (Fla. 1st DCA Dec. 21,1994); Stocker v. State, 646 So. 2d 238 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Dean v. State, 644 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Callaway v. State, 642 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Nowlin v. State, 639 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Mack v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. & Mead Johnson & Co., 673 So. 2d 100 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)…or the Florida DTPA. We find the legislative intent of the Florida DTPA evident from the plain and unambiguous words of that statute. Kirby [*109] Center of Spring Hill v. State, Dept. of Labor and Employment Sec., Div. of Unemployment Compensation, 650 So. 2d 1060, 1062 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). We are also not unmindful of the recent opinion of the Texas Supreme Court in Abbott Laboratories, Inc. (Ross Laboratories Div.) v. Segura, 907 S.W. 2d 503 (Tex.1995), wherein the Texas Supreme Court held that consumers,…
-
Int'l Ass'n of MacHinists v. Tucker, 652 So. 2d 842 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)…ld defer to a state agency with taxing authority whenever it asserts an unprecedented right to levy a tax. See [*844] Kirby Center of Sping Hill v. State of Florida, Department of Labor and Employment Security, Division of Unemployment Compensation, 650 So. 2d 1060 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). The pertinent rule of decision is that taxing statutes should be construed strictly in favor of the taxpayer contesting liability. When, on March 4, 1989, the International \$ssociation of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAMA…
Authorities Cited
- Callaway v. State, 642 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994)
- Nowlin v. State, 639 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)
- Stocker v. State, 646 So. 2d 238 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)
- Dean v. State, 644 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994)