EARL TINSLEY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1995-03-08
No. 95-0355
GUNTHER, STONE and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
650 So. 2d 1135 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1995) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Christopher v. State, 489 So. 2d 22 (Fla.1986).

GUNTHER, STONE and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Jacques H. Renaud v. State, 660 So. 2d 408 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)
    …f imposing costs as to the entire case. Hunter v. State, 651 So. 2d 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). The trial court also erred by ordering appellant to pay $1.00 a month to First Step, Inc. where said fee was not statutorily authorized. See Metz v. State, 650 So. 2d 1135 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). We, therefore, remand with directions to strike the duplicative costs as well as the unauthorized fee. WOLF, WEBSTER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.…
  • Snyder v. State, 662 So. 2d 1033 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)
    …ed in assessing legal constraint points in determining an appropriate guidelines sentence. We also find that the trial court incorrectly imposed a $1.00 per month fee for First Step, Inc. where said cost is not statutorily authorized. Metz v. State, 650 So. 2d 1135 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). We, therefore, reverse and remand for resen-tencing. WOLF, LAWRENCE and BENTON, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw