JACQUES H. RENAUD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JACQUES H. RENAUD, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
660 So. 2d 408
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1995)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellant raises a number of issues on appeal, only two of which demonstrate reversible error. The first is that the trial court erred by imposing costs and fees on a per count basis instead of imposing costs as to the entire case. Hunter v. State, 651 So. 2d 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). The trial court also erred by ordering appellant to pay $1.00 a month to First Step, Inc. where said fee was not statutorily authorized. See Metz v. State, 650 So. 2d 1135 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).
We, therefore, remand with directions to strike the duplicative costs as well as the unauthorized fee.
WOLF, WEBSTER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Brenton McNeil v. State, 215 So. 3d 55 (Fla. 2017)…Seeker v. State, 674 So. 2d 853, 853 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Neal v. State, 669 So. 2d 1113, 1114 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Stephens v. State, 667 So. 2d 312, 313 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Smith v. State, 661 So. 2d 378, 378 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Renaud v. State, 660 So. 2d 408, 408 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Nguyen v. State, 655 So. 2d 1249, 1249 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)).…
-
Justice Anthony Neal v. State, 669 So. 2d 1113 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)…lorida. Ch. 69-835, § 7, at 106, Laws of Fla.; ch. 89-521, § 7, at 405, Laws of Fla. See Hunter v. State, 651 So. 2d 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). However, the state concedes that it was error to assess costs on a per-count basis. E.g., Renaud v. State, 660 So. 2d 408 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Hunter, 651 So. 2d at 1260. Accordingly, on remand, the trial court is directed to assess costs on a per-case basis only. This court has repeatedly reversed a public defender’s lien imposed without informing the defendant of th…
-
Brenton McNEIL v. State, 162 So. 3d 274 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015)…osts.”); Neal v. State, 669 So. 2d 1113, 1114 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Stephens v. State, 667 So. 2d 312, 313 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Smith v. State, 661 So. 2d 378, 378 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (“[C]osts must be imposed on a per-case basis.”); Renaud v. State, 660 So. 2d 408, 408 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Nguyen v. State, 655 So. 2d 1249, 1249 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). I see nothing in the three costs statutes that would prevent the instant case from taking its place in the line of cases just mentioned applying the per-case rule…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Hunter v. State, 651 So. 2d 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)
- Tinsley v. State, 650 So. 2d 1135 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)
- Metz v. State, 650 So. 2d 1135 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)