RICKY A. STEVENS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1995-03-17
No. 94-2157
BOOTH, LAWRENCE and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
651 So. 2d 831 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1995) Positive Treatment
Cited by 12 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We have for review the judgment and sentence imposing adult sanction on Ricky A. Stevens (Stevens) for a series of burglaries. The State correctly concedes that the trial judge’s written order imposing adult sanctions was not entered contemporaneously with the judge’s oral pronouncement of Stevens’ sentence. Resentencing therefore is required; the judge again may impose adult sanctions. Troutman v. State, 630 So. 2d 528 (Fla.1993).

The judge’s written order is at variance with his oral pronouncement. Stevens’ sentence, on remand, must confirm to the oral pronouncement of sentence. Farnam v. State, 516 So. 2d 329 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).

Reversed and remanded for resentencing.

BOOTH, LAWRENCE and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Johnson v. State, 726 So. 2d 359 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)
    …thful offender program, to be followed by a two-year period of probation with the Department of Corrections. A defendant s sentence must conform to the oral pronouncement of the sentencing judge as reflected in the transcript. See Stevens v. State, 651 So. 2d 831 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Timmons v. State, 453 So. 2d 143 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).” Amador v. State, 713 So. 2d 1121, 1122 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1998).…
  • State v. Bock, 659 So. 2d 1196 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)
    …reflects a different conclusion regarding the intentions of this police officer. It is well settled that a trial court’s written order must generally be reversed where that order is at variance with the court’s oral pronouncement. Stevens v. State, 651 So. 2d 831 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Porras v. State, 651 So. 2d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Wright v. State, 600 So. 2d 548 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Henderson v. State, 570 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Accordingly, when the State appealed the County Court’s order of d…
  • Amador v. State, 713 So. 2d 1121 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)
    …tantiated the state’s contention that defendant had been involved in a criminal act that led to his arrest.2 A defendant’s sentence must conform to the oral pronouncement of the sentencing judge as reflected in the transcript. See Stevens v. State, 651 So. 2d 831 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Timmons v. State, 453 So. 2d 143 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). Reviewing the record, we agree with defendant’s contention that the written sentencing orders on the instant probation violation failed to reflect that the trial court awarde…

Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw