ST. ANTHONY'S HOSPITAL, INC., PETITIONER,
v.
JOAN S. LEWIS, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
St. Anthony's Hospital petitioned for certiorari to overturn a trial court's denial of its motion to dismiss a medical malpractice claim. The court held that negligent selection and retention of a physician claims against a hospital are subject to the two-year statute of limitations for medical malpractice, with the limitations period beginning on the date of the patient's knowledge of the injury and negligence, not when the hospital's negligence was discovered.
The court held that claims against a hospital for negligent selection and retention of a physician are governed by the two-year statute of limitations applicable to medical malpractice actions, and the limitations period begins to run on the date the patient has knowledge of the injury and the causal connection to negligence, which in this case was June 8, 1988, the date of the surgery. Because Lewis did not provide notice to the hospital within two years of the surgery, her claim was barred.
[1] Certiorari jurisdiction lies to review an order denying a motion to dismiss a complaint for failure to comply with presuit notice requirements under chapter 766 of the Fl…
[2] A claim against a hospital for negligent selection and retention of a physician is subject to the two-year statute of limitations for medical malpractice actions.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“a claim against the hospital for the negligent selection and retention of the physician is barred by the two-year statute of limitations”
Establishes the core holding that hospital negligent selection claims are subject to the same two-year limitations period as direct malpractice claims
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceDr. Yarborough performed spinal surgery on Mrs. Lewis at St. Anthony's Hospital on June 8, 1988, which allegedly left her debilitated. Within two year…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Medical Malpractice Statute Of Limitations cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
St. Anthony’s Hospital, Inc. (the hospital) petitions this court for a writ of certiorari to quash the trial court’s order denying its motion to dismiss. Certiorari jurisdiction lies to review an order denying a motion to dismiss a complaint for failure to comply with the presuit notice requirements found in chapter 766 of the Florida Statutes. See Shands Teaching Hospital v. Miller, 642 So. 2d 48 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Miami Physi cal Therapy Associates, Inc. v. Savage, 632 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); NME Hospitals, Inc. v. Azzariti, 573 So. 2d 173 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); NME Properties, Inc. v. McCullough, 590 So. 2d 439 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). We grant the petition and determine that the two-year statute of limitations for medical malpractice actions applies to a claim against the hospital for the negligent selection and retention of the physician who allegedly committed the malpractice and that the limitations periods begin to run on the same date.
Dr. Yarborough performed spinal surgery on the respondent, Mrs. Lewis, at the hospital on June 8, 1988. She contends the surgery left her debilitated. Within two years of the surgery, she sent to Dr. Yarborough and his P.A. notices of intent to sue for malpractice in the performance of the surgery. Thereafter, she timely filed suit against them.
Three years and eleven months after the surgery, Mrs. Lewis sent to the hospital a notice of intent to initiate suit. When the hospital denied the claim, Mrs. Lewis filed this action against the hospital. She alleged in her complaint that she “did not learn” of the hospital’s negligence “in the selection, retention and monitoring of Dr. Yarborough until after May 27, 1991, which is the date upon which plaintiff obtained knowledge that there were previous patients at [the hospital] under the care of Dr. Yarborough that received unnecessary surgeries and negligent medical treatment from Dr. Yarborough pri-or to plaintiff’s admittance to [the hospital].” The complaint contains no allegations of fraudulent concealment. The attorneys did not allude to any fraudulent concealment either at the hearing or in their briefs to this court.
The hospital filed a motion to dismiss the complaint based on the running of the two-year statute of limitations applicable to medical malpractice actions. The hospital relied on Martinez v. Lifemark Hospital of Florida, Inc., 608 So. 2d 855 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), review denied, 620 So. 2d 761 (Fla.1993). The trial court denied the motion based on the allegations of the complaint and the attachments.
We agree with the court in Martinez that a claim against the hospital for the negligent selection and retention of the physician is barred by the two-year statute of limitations. The duty of the hospital to select and review health care personnel arises under the medical malpractice statute. Furthermore, the negligent medical treatment “is both necessary to the claims against the [hospital] and inextricably connected to them.” Martinez, 608 So. 2d at 857.
In a medical malpractice action, notice or knowledge of the causal connection between the injury and the negligence triggers the running of the statute of limitations. Tanner v. Hartog, 618 So. 2d 177 (Fla.1993). In this case, it is undisputed that Mrs. Lewis had knowledge of the causal connection on June 8, 1988, the date of the surgery, and that the statute of limitations on her malpractice claim began to run on that date. The duty to investigate a claim for the negligent selection and retention of the physician arises also on the date of the notice or knowledge of injury and negligence in accordance with the standard set forth in Tanner. Because Mrs. Lewis did not send within two years of the surgery a notice of intent to sue the hospital, the negligent selection and retention claim is barred.
Petition granted; order quashed.
RYDER, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and PARKER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Palms W. Hosp. Ltd. P'ship v. Burns, 83 So. 3d 785 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)…eview health care personnel arises under the medical malpractice statute. Furthermore, the negligent medical treatment ‘is both necessary to the claims against the [hospital] and inextricably connected to them.’ ” St. Anthony’s Hosp., Inc. v. Lewis, 652 So. 2d 386, 387 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) citing Martinez v. Lifemark Hosp. of Fla., Inc., 608 So. 2d 855, 857 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)). The respondent asks that we consider Joseph v. University Behavioral LLC., 71 So. 3d 913 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011), in support of the idea t…
-
Buck v. Columbia Hosp. Corp. OF S. Broward, 147 So. 3d 604 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)…e operator of [*608] mammographic equipment “negligently applied excessive pressure and caused one of [the plaintiffs] silicone breast implants to rupture” and that the equipment had not been properly calibrated); St. Anthony’s Hosp., Inc. v. Lewis, 652 So. 2d 386, 387 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (“The duty of the hospital to select and review health care personnel arises under the medical malpractice statute [and] the negligent medical treatment ‘is both necessary to the claims against the [hospital] and inextricably…
-
Burke v. Snyder, 899 So. 2d 336 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)…from our holding in O’Shea that presuit requirements apply to a claim that a health care facility negligently supervised or retained an employee who sexually assaulted a patient. We distinguish this case from St. Anthony’s Hospital, Inc. v. Lewis, 652 So. 2d 386 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1995), wherein the second district held that the plaintiffs negligent selection and retention claim against the hospital was barred by the two-year statute of limitations applicable to medical malpractice actions. There, the underlying…
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Tanner v. Ellie Hartog, M.D., 618 So. 2d 177 (Fla. 1993)
- NME Props., Inc. v. McCULLOUGH, 590 So. 2d 439 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)
- Miami Physical Therapy Assocs., Inc. v. Savage, 632 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)
- Shands Teaching Hosp. v. Miller, 642 So. 2d 48 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)
- Taylor v. State, 573 So. 2d 173 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)
- NME Hosps., Inc. v. Azzariti, 573 So. 2d 173 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)
- Gallagher v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 608 So. 2d 855 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)
- Aurelio Martinez and Paula Martinez v. Lifemark Hosp. OF Fla., Inc., 608 So. 2d 855 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)
- W. Lewis Yarborough, M.D. v. Lewis, 652 So. 2d 834 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994)