JOHN D. GENTRY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JOHN D. GENTRY, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
652 So. 2d 518
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1995)
Opinion of the Court
[*519] PER CURIAM.
The summary denial of Gentry’s 3.800(a) motion to correct an illegal sentence is affirmed without prejudice. Gentry alleges illegal consecutive habitual offender sentences under Hale v. State, 630 So. 2d 521 (Fla.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 278, 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994). The correct remedy to seek relief is a properly filed Rule 3.850 motion. Bunch v. State, 647 So. 2d 1080 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Callaway v. State, 642 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994) (question certified), review granted, (Fla. Feb. 15, 1995); Massey v. State, 648 So. 2d 785 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).
AFFIRMED.
COBB, PETERSON and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Hale v. State, 630 So. 2d 521 (Fla. 1993)
- Callaway v. State, 642 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994)
- Massey v. State, 648 So. 2d 785 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994)
- Graydon v. State, 647 So. 2d 1080 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)
- Montgomery v. State, 647 So. 2d 1080 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)