PAUL ELIE, EDGAR C. ELIE AND PAUL A. WOODELL, APPELLANTS,
v.
TFB PROPERTIES, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, AND ROYAL REHAB CORP., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES
PER CURIAM.
The order dismissing Appellants’ counterclaim for failure to state a cause of action is reversed in part insofar as it applies to allegations of a conspiracy to engage in a fraudulent scheme. See §§ 726.105-.107, Fla.Stat. (1993). We also reject Appellees’ argument as to standing. We have examined the pleadings, which set forth sufficient factual allegations, and find no conflict with Bond v. Koscot Interplanetary, Inc., 246 So. 2d 631 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971). However, as to that portion of the order dismissing the count in Appellant’s claim founded on a waste theory, for failure to state a cause of action, we affirm as there are insufficient allegations to demonstrate a duty to Appellants. As to the latter issue, we have considered W.B. Harbeson Lumber Co. v. Geneva Mill Co., 116 Fla. 342, 156 So. 710 (1934), and deem it inapposite.
GUNTHER, STONE and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Genorval Slay v. Singletary, 676 So. 2d 456 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)…lement exists under Green. Smith v. State, 659 So. 2d 1222 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).3 We now expressly align ourselves with the decision in Smith, and to the extent prior eases such as Allen v. State, 642 So. 2d 607 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) and Sapp v. State, 652 So. 2d 1194 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) are read to suggest that a sentencing court must do more in order to effect a full award of Green credit, we recede from those opinions. Although appellee suggests that this conclusion conflicts with the decisions in Byers v. Sta…
-
Clark v. State, 656 So. 2d 252 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)…the duty of the trial court to make an award providing for time to be credited pursuant to Green, 547 So. 2d at 925, the court may enlist DOC to perform the ministerial duty of calculating the amount of time to be credited. See, e.g., Sapp v. State, 652 So. 2d 1194 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). If the trial court does enlist the aid of DOC again, DOC must proceed in accordance with this opinion. Appellee argues that DOC could have can-celled provisional credits or administrative [*254] gain-time credits, which are bas…
-
Woodell v. Transflorida Bank, 717 So. 2d 108 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)…t in an earlier appeal by these parties concerning this same issue, this court reversed a dismissal of Appellants’ counterclaim for conspiracy to engage in a fraudulent scheme, citing Florida Statutes § 726.105-107. See Elie v. TFB Properties, Inc., 652 So. 2d 1194 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). That lower court action has been consolidated with this matter because of the similarity of the facts, issues, and parties involved. As to all other issues raised, and as to the dismissal of all other causes of action set forth…
Authorities Cited
- W. B. Harbeson Lumber Co. v. Geneva Mill Co., 116 Fla. 342 (Fla. 1934)
- Wright v. Weinstock, 246 So. 2d 631 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971)
- Bond v. Koscot Interplanetary, Inc., 246 So. 2d 631 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971)