FRED CLARK, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
FRED CLARK, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
653 So. 2d 482
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1995)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This appeal which has already effectively been consolidated with and disposed of in Case No. 94r-2190, is affirmed on authority of Clark v. State, 651 So. 2d 1309 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Arbor Tree Mgmt., Inc. v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n & Steve Sutton, 69 So. 3d 376 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)…n rule under section 90.803(18), Florida Statutes (2010), which provides that a statement offered against a party is admissible when it is “[t]he party’s own statement in either an individual or a representative capacity.” See also Addison v. State, 653 So. 2d 482, 484 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (“[A] statement, made by a party, and proffered by the opposing party, is admissible whether or not the statement was against his or her interest at the time the statement was made.”). Because the claimant’s admissions are a…
-
Datron Bryant v. State, 810 So. 2d 1003 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)…ment and we affirm as to this issue. The Defendant argues that only a statement against interest constitutes an exception to the hearsay rule. However, section 90.803(18), Florida Statutes (2001), contains no such requirement.1 See Addison v. State, 653 So. 2d 482, 484 (Fla. 5th DCA1995). An exculpatory statement of a party is admissible against the party making the statement, [*1004] under section 90.803(18). Delacruz v. State, 734 So. 2d 1116, 1122 (Fia. 1st DCA 1999). The Defendant initially said he could…
Authorities Cited
- Clark v. State, 651 So. 2d 1309 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)