W. C. NELSON, LEILA M. DUVAL, WIFE OF HUGH F. DUVAL, FREDDIE ANDERSON, WIFE OF HUGH ANDERSON, AND C. C. PRITCHARD, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
SELDEN CYPRESS DOOR COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
W. C. NELSON, LEILA M. DUVAL, WIFE OF HUGH F. DUVAL, FREDDIE ANDERSON, WIFE OF HUGH ANDERSON, AND C. C. PRITCHARD, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
SELDEN CYPRESS DOOR COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
78 Fla. 203
Florida Supreme Court (1919)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 14 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
— This cause having been heretofore submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment aforesaid and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been séen .and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court .that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.
All concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sanford v. Rubin, 237 So. 2d 134 (Fla. 1970)…e. This extended litigation involved the right of petitioners to retain their employment and receive compensation for the time of their suspension by virtue of an erroneous ruling of the Personnel Board. In Nelson et al. v. Selden Cypress Door Co., 78 Fla. 203, 83 So. 286 (1919), the fi [*138] nal judgment in a mechanic’s lien foreclosure suit included a 10 per cent attorneys’ fee. On petition for rehearing in the Appellate Court, it was claimed that under the law attorneys’ fees were not recoverable in s…
-
Sarmiento v. State, 371 So. 2d 1047 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)…er, was never raised by the state either in its main brief or on oral argument in this cause and was in no way overlooked by this court. It cannot, therefore, be raised for the first time on a motion for rehearing. Nelson v. Selden Cypress Door Co., 78 Fla. 203, 83 So. 286 (1919); Cartee v. The Florida Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 354 So. 2d 81, 83 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); Price Wise Buying Group v. Nuzum, 343 So. 2d 115, 117 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). Moreover, our review of the record reveals t…
-
City OF Miami Beach v. Liflans Corp., 259 So. 2d 515 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)…Compare City of Hallendale v. Chatios, Fla.1970, 236 So. 2d 761. Moreover, the right of the landowner to be awarded its costs and attorney fees was not objected to or questioned by the city in the trial court. See Nelson v. Selden Cypress Door Co., 78 Fla. 203, 83 So. 286. The costs allowed, while substantial in their amounts, were proper in consideration of the record and the findings made by the trial court in the allowance thereof, under authority of Dade County v. Brigham, Fla. 1950, 47 So. 2d 602. Th…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence