SAMUEL COLON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Samuel Colon appealed his sentencing after pleading guilty to cocaine possession, a third-degree felony with a five-year statutory maximum. The trial court imposed successive probation and community control terms that totaled six years and nine months, exceeding the statutory maximum. The court reversed and remanded, holding that trial courts lack authority to extend probation or community control beyond the statutory maximum sentence for the underlying offense.
A trial court has no authority to extend a period of probation or community control beyond the maximum permissible sentence for the underlying offense. The fact that a defendant pleaded guilty does not preclude the right to appeal an illegal sentence.
[1] A trial court has no authority to extend a period of probation or community control beyond the maximum permissible sentence for the underlying offense.
[2] A defendant does not waive the right to appeal an illegal sentence by pleading guilty to the underlying offense.
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“A trial court has no authority to extend a period of probation beyond the maximum permissible sentence for the underlying offense.”
Establishes the core legal principle that probation terms cannot exceed statutory maximums.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAppellant pleaded guilty to possession of cocaine, a third-degree felony. The trial court initially imposed two years' probation. After multiple viola…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Revocation Of Community Control cases and more on FLexlaw
SHAHOOD, Justice.
Appellant pled guilty to possession of cocaine, a third degree felony punishable by a statutory maximum of five years. The trial court adjudicated him guilty and placed him on two years’ probation. A short time later, appellant violated his probation; the court revoked the original probationary term and reimposed a two-year probation period. The appellant again violated his probation; the court revoked his probation and placed him on two years’ community control. After a short period of time, appellant violated community control and the court resentenced him to two years’ community control.
After having served a total sentence of two years nine months (probation, community control, and jail combined) and after having had his probation and community control revoked and reinstated on several occasions due to various violations, appellant again violated his community control. The court then placed appellant on two more years of community control followed by two additional years of probation. The effect of the trial court’s last sentence is that appellant would serve a total sentence of six years and nine months, a sentence which exceeds the statutory maximum for a third degree felony. We reverse and remand for resentencing.
A trial court has no authority to extend a period of probation beyond the maximum permissible sentence for the underlying offense. Moore v. State, 623 So. 2d 795 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993) (citations omitted). Indeed, were we to permit probation and/or community control to be extended beyond the statutory maximum for the offense, courts could feasibly extend a defendant’s sentence ad infinitum beyond the statutory maximum each time probation or community control was revoked. Ogden v. State, 605 So. 2d 155 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992). The fact that appellant pled guilty to the underlying crimes does not preclude his right to take a direct appeal of an illegal sentence. Smith v. State, 358 So. 2d 1164 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978).
Accordingly, we vacate the trial court’s order placing appellant on two years’ community control followed by two years’ probation and remand with directions that the trial court enter an order consistent with this opinion.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
POLEN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Kristopher Curnette v. State, 689 So. 2d 421 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)…y maximum for burglary of a structure is five years. §§ 775.082(3)(d), 810.02(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1995). The trial court had no authority to extend the probationary period of appellant’s sentence beyond the statutory maximum sentence. Colon v. State, 660 So. 2d 373 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Klibe v. State, 569 So. 2d 943 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). On remand, the trial court shall reduce appellant’s sentence to a probationary period of 31.8 months. REVERSED and REMANDED. GLICKSTEIN, DELL and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Ogden v. State, 605 So. 2d 155 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992)
- Moore v. State, 623 So. 2d 795 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)
- Smith v. State, 358 So. 2d 1164 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978)