RUDI BARRIENTOS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1995-10-04
No. 92-04352
THREADGILL, C.J., and DANAHY, J., concur.
665 So. 2d 243 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1995) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
BLUE, Judge.

BLUE, Judge.

Rudi Barrientos appeals his convictions and sentences for numerous offenses stemming from a home invasion. We affirm his convictions but reverse and remand for re-sentencing.

Barrientos, who was a juvenile at the time he committed the offenses, was sentenced as an adult. The circuit court erred in sentencing him as an adult without making the individualized, written findings required by sections 39.059(7)(c) and (d), Florida Statutes (1991), and Troutman v. State, 630 So. 2d 528 (Fla.1993).

We, therefore, affirm Barrientos’ convictions, reverse his sentences, and remand for further proceedings. The trial court may again sentence Barrientos as an adult if it complies with the requirements of sections 39.059(7)(c) and (d) and Troutman.

THREADGILL, C.J., and DANAHY, J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Barrientos v. State, 705 So. 2d 1066 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998)
    …ce based on the trial court’s failure to make any written findings to support adult sanctions. This court remanded the ease for resentencing in compliance with section 39.059(7)(c),(d), Florida Statutes (1993), and Troutman. See Barrientos v. State, 665 So. 2d 243 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). In this appeal Barrientos argues he is again entitled to resentencing because the trial court’s written reasons for imposing adult sanctions were reduced to writing and filed three days after sentencing rather than on the same…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw