JAMES TIMONERE, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• A.L. v. State, 790 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)
  …ent do not conform due to the requirement in the written order that A.L. write a letter of apology to the victim. We agree. Since the letter of apology was not in the oral pronouncement, it must be stricken from the written judgment. Murph v. State, 666 So. 2d 197, 198 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); A.R. v. State, 504 So. 2d 66 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). Accordingly, we affirm the adjudication of delinquency but remand with instructions for the trial court to enter a new disposition order that places A.L. on community control…
• Fannin v. State, 751 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)
  …ingle fifteen-year mandatory minimum with concurrent sentences for all other counts); see also Timonere v. State, 631 So. 2d 1138 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994) (reversed and remanded for re-sentencing within guidelines), appeal after remand, Timonere v. State, 666 So. 2d 197 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (reversed repeated stacking of minimum mandatories, remanded for re-sentencing to single fifteen-year mandatory minimum with concurrent sentences for all other counts). On December 8, 1993, after this court handed down its opinio…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• B.R.W. v. State, 799 So. 2d 328 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)
  …rt’s oral ruling. Based on the evidence and the trial court’s oral pronouncement, we agree that the disposition order must be corrected to reflect that B.R.W. was found guilty of a second-degree misdemeanor for criminal mischief. See Murph v. State, 666 So. 2d 197, 198 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); A.R. v. State, 504 So. 2d 66 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); § 806.13(1)(b)(1), Fla. Stat. (2000). Additionally, the single disposition order utilized in this case does not separately identify the maximum commitment period imposed on e…

Authorities Cited

• Barry v. State, 654 So. 2d 1229 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)
• Timonere v. State, 631 So. 2d 1138 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994)