TEDDY REESE WATSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
TEDDY REESE WATSON, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
667 So. 2d 955
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1996)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
In this direct criminal appeal, we affirm appellant’s convictions without discussion. However, we strike from the costs imposed with regard to count II the “additional court cost” of $25.00, because no statutory authority was cited to support this cost; and all of the remaining costs imposed with regard to count II as duplicative of those imposed with regard to count I. Stephens v. State, 667 So. 2d 312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Hunter v. State, 651 So. 2d 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). On remand, the trial court may reimpose the $25.00 “additional court cost,” if it cites the statutory authority for that assessment.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; and REMANDED, with directions.
ERVIN, MINER and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rafael v. State, 679 So. 2d 314 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)…ustice Assessment. See Nguyen v. State, 655 So. 2d 1249 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). In addition, the $25.00 assessed as “Additional Court Cost” in Count II must be stricken because no statutory authority was cited to support this cost. See Watson v. State, 667 So. 2d 955 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). On remand, the court may reimpose this cost if it cites the statutory authority for that assessment. See Stephens v. State, 667 So. 2d 312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Bradshaw v. State, 638 So. 2d 1024 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). In all othe…
Authorities Cited
- Hunter v. State, 651 So. 2d 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)
- Stephens v. State, 667 So. 2d 312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)