CLEMENTE DOMINGUEZ, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 3d DCA | 1996-04-03
No. 95-1987
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GODERICH and GREEN, JJ.
669 So. 2d 1171 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1996) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Upon the State’s proper confession of error, we reverse the appellant’s concurrent seven year probationary sentences imposed as a result of his plea to five third degree felonies, all of which were alleged to have been committed prior to January 1, 1994. This sentence is illegal because the statutory maximum for each such third degree felony is five years of state supervision.1. See section 775.082(3)(d), Fla.Stat. (1991). A sentence in excess of the statutory maximum may not be imposed even pursuant to a plea agreement between the parties. Larson v. State, 572 So. 2d 1368, 1371 (Fla.1991); Stephens v. State, 627 So. 2d 543 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Arnett v. State, 598 So. 2d 235 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Darden v. State, 588 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); see also Marshall v. State, 623 So. 2d 1230 (Fla. 1st DCA), appeal dismissed, 626 So. 2d 207 (Fla.1993) (invalidating use of habitual offender statute pursuant to plea in absence of requisite prior convictions).

On remand, the parties may either renegotiate a plea to a lawfully structured sentence or the appellant shall be permitted to withdraw his plea and proceed to trial on all of the original counts of the information.

Reversed and remanded.

. Crimes committed after January 1, 1994, are subject to the 1994 sentencing guidelines, which may permissibly exceed the statutory maximum enunciated in section 775.082, Florida Statutes (1995). §§ 921.001(4)(b), 921.001(5), 921.0014(2) Fla.Stat. (1995); Rule 3.702(b), Fla. R.Crim.P.; see also Gardner v. State, 661 So. 2d 1274 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Gifford v. State, 744 So. 2d 1046 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)
    …lea. A defendant cannot by virtue of a plea bargain confer upon a court the authority to impose an illegal sentence. See Larson v. State, 572 So. 2d 1368, 1371 (Fla.1991); Jones v. State, 664 So. 2d 1116, 1117 (Fla.4th DCA 1995); Dominguez v. State, 669 So. 2d 1171 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). We reverse the trial court’s order denying post-conviction relief. On remand, the illegal sentence shall be vacated, and the trial court shall either impose a lawful sentence if the state agrees or permit Gif-ford to withdraw hi…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw