STANLEY EUGENE WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Barfield v. State, 762 So. 2d 564 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)
  …urpose of the defense is to exonerate a defendant from acts committed by another defendant, which departed from the original plan. Parker v. State, 458 So. 2d 750, 752 (Fla.1984). See also Bryant v. State, 412 So. 2d 347 (Fla.1982); Walker v. State, 671 So. 2d 817 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Teal v. State, 658 So. 2d 603 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Rossi v. State, 602 So. 2d 614 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Rodriguez v. State, 571 So. 2d 1356 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). The trial judge agreed at the charge conference that -the Independen…
• Gordon v. State, 219 So. 3d 189 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)
  …evidence to support a theory) regarding an intervening cause of death. Martin v. State, 342 So. 2d 501, 503 (Fla. 1977) (superseded on other grounds by Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.490); Humphrey v. State, 690 So. 2d 1351 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Walker v. State, 671 So. 2d 817 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). See also Daugherty v. State, 211 So. 3d 29 (Fla. 2017). In the same way, whether a jury may lawfully find a defendant guilty of two or more lesser-included offenses, instead of the compound offense charged, is not premised on an…
• Humphrey v. State, 690 So. 2d 1351 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)
  …lity as a principal in the homicide, then the jury’s responsibility would be to acquit the defendant of the charge — indeed, the jury in this ease aequit-ted the defendant of another of the charges against him.3 Defendant relies on Walker v. State, 671 So. 2d 817 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), but the facts of that case fall into the same pattern as Brotar. There the victim had received an independent injury two days prior to the charged offense. Since the facts of the case showed that the cause of death may have been…

Authorities Cited

• Tedd J. Popple v. State, 626 So. 2d 185 (Fla. 1993)
• Tobias Barfield v. State, 594 So. 2d 259 (Fla. 1992)
• Haas v. State, 345 So. 2d 802 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977)