FRANK HAAS, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• City OF Hollywood & Civil Serv. Bd. of the City of Hollywood v. Washington, 384 So. 2d 1315 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)
  …those officials specified in the statute are authorized to grant immunity. See Lurie v. Florida State Board of Dentistry, 288 So. 2d 223 (Fla.1973) (county solicitor); State v. Papy, 239 So. 2d 604 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970) (grand jury); Holland v. State, 345 So. 2d 802 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977) (state attorney). Accordingly, a police officer cannot, under the statute, grant immunity. In the case at bar appellee had not been served with a subpoena, nor was he at any time in custody. In fact, on the second occasion that…
• Williams v. State, 671 So. 2d 817 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)
  …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d) (1995); Popple v. State, 626 So. 2d 185 (Fla.1993); Barfield v. State, 594 So. 2d 259 (Fla.1992); Holland v. State, 345 So. 2d 802 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).…
• State v. Jenny, 424 So. 2d 142 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)
  …statute in order to compel that testimony. Only then is the testimony (or evidence produced pursuant to subpoena duces tecum) deemed compulsory, bringing in the statutory immunity, both transactional and as to use.2 Appellee cites Holland v. State, 345 So. 2d 802 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977), State v. Yatman, 320 So. 2d 401 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975), and State ex rel. Lurie v. Rosier, 226 So. 2d 825 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969) in support of his entitlement to immunity. None of the cited cases expressly considered or decided the qu…

Authorities Cited

• Heatherly v. State, 343 So. 2d 54 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977)
• Holmes v. State, 343 So. 2d 632 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977)