CRAIG STEPHEN EDWARDS, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Guzman, 697 So. 2d 1263 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)
  …hstanding that the motion follows alleged discovery violations by the state. Moore v. State, 697 So. 2d 569 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); State v. Harrill, 679 So. 2d 34 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Zyla v. Cohen, 686 So. 2d 603 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Stridiron v. State, 672 So. 2d 871 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); State v. Guzman, 667 So. 2d 989 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Colby v. McNeill, 595 So. 2d 115 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), review denied, 604 So. 2d 487 (Fla.1992); State v. Brown, 527 So. 2d 209 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), review denied, 534 So. 2d 398 (…
• von Waldner v. State, 860 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)
  …to a discharge under the speedy trial rule even though the defendant is not tried within the relevant trial period, if, at any time during the period, he or she moves for a continuance of the trial date and the motion is granted. Stridiron v. State, 672 So. 2d 871, 872 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). But here, the defendant moved for a continuance only after the speedy trial period had already run, not before. The general rule does not apply when, as here, the defendant is not ready for trial because of substantial disco…
• Alvarez v. State, 729 So. 2d 472 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)
  …ion, the defendant was ready to proceed with trial on December 14th. Because the trial was not held on or by that date, through no fault of the defendant, the defendant is entitled to a discharge. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.191(p)(3); Stridiron v. State, 672 So. 2d 871 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). Accordingly, the petition for writ of prohibition is granted, and the trial court is directed to discharge the defendant from this case.…

Authorities Cited

• Davis v. State, 661 So. 2d 1193 (Fla. 1995)