CALVIN ROYALS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
The appellant challenges three special conditions of community control and probation which were not orally pronounced at sentencing. Based on State v. Hart, 668 So. 2d 589 (Fla.1996), we affirm as to condition six which provides that appellant will not use intoxicants to excess nor visit places where intoxicants, drugs or other dangerous substances are unlawfully sold, dispensed or used. We reverse conditions twelve and thirteen which were not orally pronounced and are not standard conditions of community control or probation. Shacraha v. State, 635 So. 2d 1051 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).
Affirmed in part and reversed in part with directions to eliminate conditions twelve and thirteen from the order of community control.
GUNTHER, C.J., and WARNER and FARMER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bush v. Grasswick, 830 So. 2d 963 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)…Fla.1995). When the Florida Supreme Court in Seton expressly disapproved this court’s decision in Bailey v. Hagler, 575 So. 2d 679 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), it disapproved the rationale employed by the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Sapp v. Anderson, 673 So. 2d 569 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), cause dismissed, 680 So. 2d 424 (Fla.1996). We affirm the trial court and disagree with Sapp. KAHN, J., concurring. BROWNING, J., concurring in result only with separate opinion.…
-
DAY v. Nova, 916 So. 2d 903 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Sapp v. Anderson, 673 So. 2d 569 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). GUNTHER, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Hart, 668 So. 2d 589 (Fla. 1996)
- Shacraha v. State, 635 So. 2d 1051 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)