KEITH B. JONES, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1996-05-22
No. 95-01280
PARKER, A.C.J., and QUINCE and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.
674 So. 2d 188 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1996)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court affirmed the conviction but struck a portion of a probation condition and certain costs/fines that were not orally pronounced or statutorily authorized.


Facts & Procedural History

The defendant appealed his conviction. The trial court imposed a probation condition requiring payment for drug/alcohol testing and assessed costs/fin…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

[*189] PER CURIAM.

The Assistant Public Defender has filed this appeal on behalf of Keith B. Jones pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We affirm the conviction, strike a portion of one condition of probation, strike an imposed cost/fine, and strike an imposed cost.

Probation condition (8), in part, required Jones to pay for random testing for drugs and alcohol. Because this is a special condition and the trial court did not orally pronounce that Jones must pay for random testing for drugs and alcohol, we strike that portion of condition (8). See Malone v. State, 652 So. 2d 902 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

The written judgment imposed a cost/fine in the amount of $1245. The trial court gave no statutory authority. We strike that assessment. See Evans v. State, 653 So. 2d 1103 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

The trial court imposed a $2 cost pursuant to section 943.25(13), Florida Statutes (1993). This is a discretionary cost which the trial court must pronounce orally at sentencing. Green v. State, 667 So. 2d 432 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). We strike that cost. Upon remand the state may seek to reimpose the cost/fine .of $1245 and the section 943.25(13) cost in accordance with the law. See Evans.

PARKER, A.C.J., and QUINCE and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw