JOSEPH GREEN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JOSEPH GREEN, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
679 So. 2d 1294
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1996)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 9 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Although we are concerned about the time limitations imposed by the trial court on voir dire examination,1 appellant did not preserve this issue for appeal, because he affirmatively accepted the jury without renewing his prior objection. Joiner v. State, 618 So. 2d 174, 176 (Fla.1993); Stripling v. State, 664 So. 2d 2, 3 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995).
AFFIRMED.
GLICKSTEIN, WARNER and GROSS, JJ., concur. . See O'Hara v. State, 642 So. 2d 592 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Pineda v. State, 571 So. 2d 105 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Williams v. State, 424 So. 2d 148 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Milstein v. Mut. Sec. Life Ins. Co., 705 So. 2d 639 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)…made allegedly prejudicial comments; held, issue not preserved); Stripling v. State, 664 So. 2d 2, 3 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (trial court rulings that allegedly unduly restricted defendant’s voir dire inquiry; held, issue not preserved); Green v. State, 679 So. 2d 1294, 1294 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (time limitations imposed by trial court on voir dire examination; held, issue not preserved). We therefore conclude it was necessary for plaintiff to renew the objection prior to the time that the jury was sworn. It is su…
-
Lavin v. State, 754 So. 2d 784 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)…made allegedly prejudicial comments; held, issue not preserved); Stripling v. State, 664 So. 2d 2, 3 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (trial court rulings that allegedly unduly restricted defendant’s voir dire inquiry; held, issue not preserved); Green v. State, 679 So. 2d 1294, 1294 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (time limitations imposed by trial court on voir dire examination; held, issue not preserved). Lavin exhausted his challenges and the trial court simply announced: “That’s it. Bring [the jury panel] in.” Thus, Lavin did not…
-
Berry v. State, 792 So. 2d 611 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)…jury selection). This court has applied the principle of Joiner where the trial court imposed time limitations on voir dire, but the objection to the limitation was not renewed prior to the defendant affirmatively accepting the jury. Green v. State, 679 So. 2d 1294 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). It has been applied by the fifth district in circumstances similar to this case. Barnette v. State, 768 So. 2d 1246 (Fla. 6th DCA 2000). Although the objection in this case did not involve the selection of a juror, as Joiner di…
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Joiner v. State, 618 So. 2d 174 (Fla. 1993)
- Williams v. State, 424 So. 2d 148 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982)
- O'Hara v. State, 642 So. 2d 592 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)
- Pineda v. State, 571 So. 2d 105 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
- Stripling v. State, 664 So. 2d 2 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)