BANG THI VO, APPELLANT,
v.
TRUNG QUANG BUI, APPELLEE
BANG THI VO, APPELLANT,
TRUNG QUANG BUI, APPELLEE
680 So. 2d 601
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1996)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The order in this case, requiring the wife to undergo a psychological evaluation, is not an appealable nonfinal order. See Pariser v. Pariser, 601 So. 2d 291 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). Because the alleged harm will not be remediable on appeal, we treat the instant case as a petition for writ of certiorari. Pariser. We conclude that the trial court did not depart from the essential requirements of law; therefore, we deny the writ. See Elder v. Carter, 670 So. 2d 1032 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).
PARKER, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In the Interest of G.D. and C.D. v. Dep't of Child. & Fam. Servs., 870 So. 2d 235 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)…2003). This court has held that interlocutory orders that improperly require mental examinations cause material injury to the petitioner that cannot be remedied on direct appeal. Gonzalez v. State, 829 So. 2d 277, 279 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Vo v. Bui, 680 So. 2d 601, 601 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Gasparino v. Murphy, 352 So. 2d 933, 935 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977). Thus, the parents have satisfied the threshold jurisdictional inquiry in this case. The parents allege that the trial court’s order departed from the essential req…
-
Olges v. Dougherty, 856 So. 2d 6 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)…mation may reasonably cause material injury of an irreparable nature. Illustrative is ‘cat out of the bag’ material that could be used by an unscrupulous litigant to injure another person or party outside the context of the litigation.”); Vo v. Bui, 680 So. 2d 601, 601 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996) (treating ease as involving a petition for writ of certiorari because the alleged harm, a nonfinal order “requiring the wife to undergo a psychological evaluation .... will not be remediable on appeal” (citation omitted)); Ga…
-
State v. Salzero, 714 So. 2d 445 (Fla. 1998)…PER CURIAM. We have for review Salzero v. State, 697 So. 2d 553 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (en banc), [*446] which certified conflict with State v. Driggers, 680 So. 2d 601 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); State v. McGruder, 664 So. 2d 1126 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); and Climpson v. State, 528 So. 2d 1296 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4) of the Florida Constitution. On February 11, 1996, Sa…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Pariser v. Pariser, 601 So. 2d 291 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)
- Elder v. Carter, 670 So. 2d 1032 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996)