KENNETH W. CONLEY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that certain costs and probationary conditions were improperly imposed because they were not orally pronounced at sentencing.
Appellant challenged his judgments and sentences for multiple offenses. He contended that certain costs and probationary conditions were improperly im…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Costs Of Prosecution cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
On this appeal filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), the appellant, Kenneth W. Conley, challenges his judgments and sentences for trespass of an occupied structure, aggravated battery with a firearm, and being a felon in possession of a firearm. Though he raises several issues, we find merit only in his contention that certain costs and probationary conditions were improperly imposed. We therefore strike those costs and conditions.
Specifically, we strike the $45 assessment for the costs of prosecution because such costs were neither requested nor orally pronounced at sentencing. See Brown v. State, 658 So. 2d 1058 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). We also strike all of probation condition nine and that portion of probation condition 13 which requires Conley to pay for drug and alcohol testing, evaluation, and treatment, because those were special conditions which were not orally pronounced at sentencing. See Hamilton v. State, 653 So. 2d 1068 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).
Accordingly, the foregoing costs and conditions are stricken. Conley’s judgments and sentences are otherwise affirmed.
DANAHY, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Dolphis A. Hamilton v. State, 653 So. 2d 1068 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)
- Bridgette Brown v. State, 658 So. 2d 1058 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)