WILLIAM ALBRITTON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 1996-09-06
No. 94-2765
HARRIS, THOMPSON and ANTOON, JJ., concur.
681 So. 2d 759 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1996) Negative Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Snead v. State, 616 So. 2d 964, 965 (Fla.1993); King v. State, 648 So. 2d 183, 185 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994), rev. granted, 659 So. 2d 1087 (Fla.1995).

HARRIS, THOMPSON and ANTOON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Albritton v. State, 709 So. 2d 101 (Fla. 1998)
    …PER CURIAM. We have for review Albritton v. State, 681 So. 2d 759 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996), which conflicts with this Court’s recent opinion in King v. State, 681 So. 2d 1136 (Fla.1996). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. In King, we held that where a trial judge determines that a defendant qualifie…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw