WILLIAM ALBRITTON, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Resentencing cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Albritton v. State, 681 So. 2d 759 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996), which conflicts with this Court’s recent opinion in King v. State, 681 So. 2d 1136 (Fla.1996). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. In King, we held that where a trial judge determines that a defendant qualifies as a habitual offender but imposes a non-habitual offender sentence of imprisonment followed by probation, upon a subsequent violation of probation by the defendant, the trial judge on resentencing may not impose a habitual offender sentence. 681 So. 2d at 1141. Under Rule 3.701(d)(14) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, “[sjentences imposed after revocation of probation or community control must be in accordance with the [sentencing] guidelines.” Accordingly, we quash the decision below and remand for proceedings consistent with our opinion in King.
It is so ordered.
KOGAN, C.J., OVERTON, SHAW, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., and GRIMES, Senior Justice, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Public Defender v. State, 115 So. 3d 261 (Fla. 2013)…yed filing of appeals for almost all defendants in the Public Defender’s Office.” Public Defender, 12 So. 3d at 802 (citing In re Pub. Defender’s Certification of Conflict & Motion to Withdraw Due to Excessive Caseload & Motion for Writ of Mandamus, 709 So. 2d 101 (Fla.1998)). Additionally, the majority’s decision today permitting aggregate withdrawal without individualized proof of constitutional harm leaves open the potential continuation of the improper remedy implemented by the trial court, where the jud…1 / 2
-
The State of Fla. & Off. of Crim. Conflict & Civil Reg'l Counsel v. Public Defender, 12 So. 3d 798 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)…tion and a backlog of cases had caused the delayed filing of appeals for almost all defendants in the Public Defender’s Office. In re Pub. Defender’s Certification of Conflict & Mot. to Withdraw Due to Excessive Caseload & Mot. for Writ of Mandamus, 709 So. 2d 101 (Fla.1998) (“In re Ceiiification 1998”). Unlike In re Certification 1998, here, there has been no initial attempt at individualized withdrawal. Instead, PDll’s first attempt at withdrawal was by way of a motion to withdraw en masse. In re Certifica…
-
Darrin McGILLIS v. Dep't of Child. & Fam. Servs., 738 So. 2d 1023 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)…with the orderly process of judicial administration, courts may, and should, exercise their inherent authority to prevent abuse of the judicial system by, among other things, barring the offending party from filing further proceedings.”), approved, 709 So. 2d 101 (Fla.1998); Attwood v. Singletary, 661 So. 2d 1216 (Fla.1995); Huffman v. State, 693 So. 2d 570 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Dennis v. State, 685 So. 2d 1373 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Holmes v. State, 669 So. 2d 360 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- King v. State, 681 So. 2d 1136 (Fla. 1996)
- Albritton v. State, 681 So. 2d 759 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)