JAMES MICHAEL DESJARLAIS, APPELLANT,
v.
SAMANTHA ABIGAIL DESJARLAIS, APPELLEE
JAMES MICHAEL DESJARLAIS, APPELLANT,
SAMANTHA ABIGAIL DESJARLAIS, APPELLEE
681 So. 2d 847
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1996)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Henderson v. Henderson, 537 So. 2d 125 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988), cause dismissed, 542 So. 2d 989 (Fla.1989); Evans v. Evans, 490 So. 2d 1035 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); see Smoak v. Smoak, 658 So. 2d 568 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Wages v. Wages, 660 So. 2d 797 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Elkins v. Vanden Bosch, 433 So. 2d 1251 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), pet. for review dismissed, 438 So. 2d 831(Fla.1983); Adams v. Adams, 385 So. 2d 688 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Ritsi v. Ritsi 160 So. 2d 159 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964), cert. denied, 166 So. 2d 591 (Fla.1964). See generally Jaffee v. Jaffee, 394 So. 2d 443 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
L.K. v. State, 729 So. 2d 1011 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)…Justice for a moderate-risk residential program may only be held in secure detention awaiting dispositional placement for a period not to exceed fifteen days after commitment. See S.B. v. Rayford, 717 So. 2d 1107 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); R.E.D. v. Gnat, 681 So. 2d 847 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Department of Health and Rehabilitative Servs., Juvenile Justice v. J.S.G., 635 So. 2d 1065 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). Notwithstanding the child’s acquiescence in a longer period of detention, the plain language of the statute forbids…
-
In the Interest of J.W. a child v. Leitner, 801 So. 2d 295 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)…the First District that the significance of section 985.215(10)(c) is that it eliminates-for high-risk children-the time constraints that apply to those in detention care pending placement in less-restrictive commitment programs. See R.E.D. v. Gnat, 681 So. 2d 847 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). [*297] Throughout chapter 985, and particularly in section 985.215, the legislature differentiates between the terms “detention care” and • “secure detention.” Had the legislature intended that children awaiting placement in hig…
-
J.B. v. Rayford, 707 So. 2d 434 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)…acement by no more than five days in secure detention. His continued confinement for longer than that period, as ordered by the court below, is therefore unjustified. See M.L.F. v. State, 678 So. 2d 1307 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); see also R.E.D. v. Gnat, 681 So. 2d 847 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). Accordingly, habeas corpus is granted and the petitioner ordered released from secure detention forthwith.…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Jaffee v. Jaffee, 394 So. 2d 443 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
- Ritsi v. Ritsi, 160 So. 2d 159 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)
- Adams v. Adams, 385 So. 2d 688 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
- Elkins v. Bosch, 433 So. 2d 1251 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
- Smoak v. Smoak, 658 So. 2d 568 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)
- Evans v. Evans, 490 So. 2d 1035 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)
- Henderson v. Hal Henderson, 537 So. 2d 125 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)
- Arden M. Wages v. Aubry D. Wages, 660 So. 2d 797 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)
- Ne. Polk Cnty. Hosp. Dist. v. Williams, 166 So. 2d 591 (Fla. 1964)
- Garcia v. Garcia, 166 So. 2d 591 (Fla. 1964)