BEN H. WEAVER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
BEN H. WEAVER, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
683 So. 2d 1156
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1996)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
In this Anders1 appeal, the judgment and split sentence are affirmed except for two special conditions of defendant’s probation. The special condition requiring a $1 payment to the police academy must be stricken since the probation order does not reference statutory authority, and the special condition requiring defendant to pay for certain evaluation tests unless otherwise waived by the probation officer is likewise stricken, as it was not orally pronounced at sentencing. See Wilkes v. State, 675 So. 2d 258 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Justice v. State, 674 So. 2d 123 (Fla.1996).
AFFIRMED as MODIFIED.
W. SHARP, GOSHORN and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur. . See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Freeman v. State, 885 So. 2d 477 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)…ent proceeding was successive, and added: ‘We further warn Freeman that future such motions will be stricken as an abuse of process and he may be barred from filing any further pro se appeals regarding his conviction and sentence.” Freeman v. State, 683 So. 2d 1156, 1156 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). Freeman continued his post conviction attacks. This court issued a show cause [*478] order pursuant to State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla.1999) (court can restrict future pro se pleadings if it first provides a pro se…
-
Grantham v. State, 712 So. 2d 851 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)…ohibit Anthony S. Grantham from filing any further pro se appeals or petitions in this court regarding the judgment and sentence imposed in Osceola County, Case No. CR93-2009. See Davis v. State, 705 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Freeman v. State, 683 So. 2d 1156 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d 409 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). AFFIRMED; FUTURE PRO SE FILINGS PROHIBITED. DAUKSCH, W. SHARP and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.…
-
Grantham v. State, 695 So. 2d 892 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)…ground — involuntary plea. Since the grounds set forth in this motion were raised or should have been raised in the [*893] prior motion, the current motion is both successive and improper, and constitutes an abuse of procedure. See Freeman v. State, 683 So. 2d 1156 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). AFFIRMED. W. SHARP, THOMPSON and ANTOON, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Justice v. State, 674 So. 2d 123 (Fla. 1996)
- Wilkes v. State, 675 So. 2d 258 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)
- Robinson v. State, 675 So. 2d 258 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)