ANTHONY SCOTT GRANTHAM, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Successive Motions cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from the summary denial of a motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. This is the second 3.850 motion filed by appellant that was denied by the trial court as successive and improper. In appellant’s previous 3.850 appeal, we issued a written opinion agreeing with the trial court that appellant’s motion was successive and improper. See Grantham v. State, 695 So. 2d 892 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). Appellant has continually raised ineffective assistance of counsel and involuntary plea claims, which all could have been raised in the first 3.850 motion. We therefore affirm the order denying relief, and prohibit Anthony S. Grantham from filing any further pro se appeals or petitions in this court regarding the judgment and sentence imposed in Osceola County, Case No. CR93-2009. See Davis v. State, 705 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Freeman v. State, 683 So. 2d 1156 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d 409 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).
AFFIRMED; FUTURE PRO SE FILINGS PROHIBITED.
DAUKSCH, W. SHARP and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Kindle, 782 So. 2d 971 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)…may continue past that time if the law enforcement officer has a reasonable suspicion based on articulable facts that criminal activity was committed or was about to be committed. Dukes v. State, 753 So. 2d 780 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000); State v. Sanders, 712 So. 2d 851 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); see also McNeil v. State, 656 So. 2d 1320 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). The State did not establish by substantial competent evidence that the officer had such a suspicion when he stopped Kindle. However, the detention may also continue…
-
Dukes v. State, 753 So. 2d 780 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)…The search in this case was improperly initiated after the traffic citations were issued and during a time when there was no reasonable suspicion by the officers, based on articulable facts, that criminal activity was afoot. See State v. Sanders, 712 So. 2d 851 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) and McNeil v. State, 656 So. 2d 1320 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). Dukes and her son were illegally detained for completion of the K-9 search. We reject the alternative argument of the state that Dukes exhibited suspicious behavior becaus…
Authorities Cited
- Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d 409 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)
- Davis v. State, 705 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)
- Garcia v. State, 695 So. 2d 892 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)
- Freeman v. State, 683 So. 2d 1156 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)
- Weaver v. State, 683 So. 2d 1156 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)