ROLANDO REYES, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Written Reasons For Departure cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
As the state properly concedes, the written order of probation revocation and the sentence entered in the case do not comport with the oral pronouncement of sentence made at the time of the probation revocation hearing. Therefore, the case must be remanded to the trial court for the correction of the written orders on revocation and sentencing.
Further, the imposition of a sentence of years to run consecutively to a life sentence is a departure sentence pursuant to Robinson v. State, 520 So. 2d 1 (Fla.1988); Cleveland v. State, 673 So. 2d 983 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) which requires written reasons. Since the trial court did not realize that it was imposing a departure sentence, the cause is remanded to allow the court “to consider on remand whether a departure sentence is appropriate and, if so, to set forth valid reasons for departure”. State v. Betancourt, 552 So. 2d 1107,1108 (Fla.1989).
The third issue raised by defendant Reyes is without merit.
Remanded with directions.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Smith v. State, 941 So. 2d 479 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)…nce of the evidence the proper amount of the loss. In proving the amount of the loss, the State may not rely on hearsay testimony when the defense properly objects to its introduction. J.D. v. State, 693 So. 2d 146 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); J.L. v. State, 684 So. 2d 883 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Louis v. State, 654 So. 2d 1290 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Delks v. State, 622 So. 2d 624 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). ANALYSIS In this case, there is no question or dispute that actual costs were incurred— the victim’s body was returned to an…
-
J.D. v. State, 693 So. 2d 146 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)…the trial court’s order of restitution where the damage estimates relied upon to support the restitution amount were improperly based entirely on inadmissable hearsay evidence and the defendant properly objected to its admission. See J.L. v. State, 684 So. 2d 883, 884 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Louis v. State, 654 So. 2d 1290, 1290 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Branker v. State, 650 So. 2d 195, 196 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Boyle v. State, 589 So. 2d 1015, 1015 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). Accordingly, we remand this cause for a new resti…
-
W.D. v. State, 929 So. 2d 623 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See J.L. v. State, 684 So. 2d 883 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Butler v. State, 354 So. 2d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Vickers v. State, 303 So. 2d 700 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974).…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- State v. Betancourt, 552 So. 2d 1107 (Fla. 1989)
- Robinson v. State, 520 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1988)
- Cleveland v. State, 673 So. 2d 983 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)